Saturday, December 7, 2013

REVIEW 234: R…RAJKUMAR

Release date:
December 6, 2013
Director:
Prabhu Deva
Cast:


Language:

Shahid Kapoor, Sonu Sood, Sonakshi Sinha, Mukul Dev, Ashish Vidyarthi, Asrani, Srihari
Hindi

Somewhere in a secret location between Mumbai and Chennai, there’s a factory that has mastered the assembly-line technique. The formula for the factory’s product is this: physically invincible hero (usually played by Akshay Kumar) + vulnerable heroine (almost always played by Sonakshi Sinha) + evil villain + lots of scenes in which the heroine is stalked by the hero or roughed up by the villain or both + loud songs + massive crowds of extras led by hero dancing to those songs + guest appearance by the rubber-spined Prabhu Deva in one of the songs + loud loud colours + litres of blood + shouting + humour interspersed with violence + one punch line that the hero repeats at regular intervals = a film!

Now here are instructions for the factory workers this week: (1) Replace Akshay Kumar with Shahid Kapoor. (2) In place of one villain have two. (3) Give Shahid’s character the grandiose line, “Silent ho jaa varna main violent ho jaaoonga.” (4) Check off the rest of the items in the formula – Sonakshi, yawn, check… blood, yawn, check… Prabhu Deva (also the film’s director), yawn, check… Ladies and gentlemen, here’s presenting RAMBO RAJKUMAR!!!!!

Oh ya, that’s the old title of R…Rajkumar. The name change was reportedly forced on the makers by copyright issues. Wish they’d been legally compelled to come up with at least one original thought for this project. For whatever it’s worth, this is the story: Romeo Rajkumar (Kapoor) works for the cocaine lord Shivraj (Sonu Sood) in Dhartipur village. He is assigned to kill Shivraj’s rival Parmar (Ashish Vidyarthi) but is distracted by the discovery that Chanda, the girl he ‘loves’, is the fellow’s niece. Chanda doesn’t care for Rajkumar but it’s nothing that some good old Hindi-film-style stalking and roughing up can’t fix. The damsel’s heart having been thus won, another impediment surfaces when Shivraj also falls for her. What follows is lots of scheming, screaming and bloodletting until the happily ever after.

I watched R…Rajkumar in a benumbed state of boredom because, try though I did, I couldn’t find a single element in it that we haven’t already seen in the gaudy-garish genre in recent years. The film is so cliched that I don’t even have the energy here to dwell at length on the many feminist concerns it raises with the treatment of its heroine. It would be callous not to raise one point though: there is nothing more disturbing in this film than the passing scene of a corrupt police officer raping a woman who’s probably in custody at his police station. We don’t actually see him in the act. The camera in the adjoining room is aimed somewhere in the direction of the bars of an open cell. On the floor we see a woman’s out-stretched arm and we hear her cries. A phone rings, someone calls out to the policeman who emerges from the cell in a dishevelled state while the woman continues to wail. In another film this could have been a poignant moment. In R…Rajkumar – a film which doesn’t display an iota of tenderness on any front, in which the hero’s irritating and distasteful idea of wooing is to pucker up his lips at every sight of the reluctant girl, which treats women as showpieces, in which bosomy female humans appear out of nowhere to grind their hips and bulging breasts to a song, in which the rape scene is just casually thrown in as if designed to titillate the target audience, in which no context of sensitivity is offered before or after that scene – it’s above and beyond offensive.

Any positives, did you ask? Well, Kapoor looks cute and dances well as usual, he fights smoothly, is funny in places and throws himself into the role with gusto, but what can actorly zeal do in the face of such a trite screenplay? It’s tragic to see Vishal Bhardwaj’s Guddu/Charlie from Kaminey reducing himself to a Romeo Rajkumar. R…Rajkumar has nothing new to offer even a fine actor like Sood whose Chhedi Singh in Dabangg was hilarious. No, it’s not good enough that his bare torso is a sight to behold or that, as he helpfully informs us, his upper arm has a wider circumference than Romeo Rajkumar’s thigh. Sonakshi Sinha looks sweeter here than ever before, possibly because she thankfully doesn’t repeatedly flash her profile at us in this film as she has done in that trademark, painfully self-conscious fashion in all her films so far. She clearly has comic abilities worth tapping, but persists in wasting herself on formulaic films in which women characters are particularly poorly written and the heroine is a prize to be won by the hero or villain. In the midst of the dialoguebaazi by all the characters, she too has a scene in which she gets to yell “khamosh!!!” in a bow to her famous daddy, but it ends up being a decidedly unfunny moment in a film filled with un-funny-ness, repetitiveness, bombast and noise.

In the first half hour it does seem like R…Rajkumar might actually offer that blend of humour and action that made Dabangg an enjoyable experience. It fizzles out though as the film becomes gradually indistinguishable from Rowdy Rathore, Khiladi 786, Boss and others that have emerged from the factory. What exactly is the difference? I’ve already forgotten!

Rating (out of five): *

CBFC Rating (India):
U/A
Running time:
2 hours 27 minutes
Photograph courtesy: Everymedia PR


Friday, December 6, 2013

POLL 4: KOI… MIL GAYA VS KRRISH VS KRRISH 3

Dear Readers,

It’s time for another poll on this blog, but before that let’s discuss the poll question I had asked you last month:

WHICH IS YOUR FAVOURITE FILM IN THE KRRISH SERIES STARRING HRITHIK ROSHAN?

Here’s how you voted:

72.6% of you chose Koi… Mil Gaya.

14.5% picked Krrish.

12.9% voted for Krrish 3.

MY TAKE:

This one’s easy because for the first time since I started holding polls on this blog, I find my views exactly matching yours: 


Koi… Mil Gaya: My favourite from the Krrish series, this is the film with which Rakesh Roshan proved that India can make a slick special-effects-heavy film on a fraction of the budget that a similar Hollywood film would have at its disposal. It drew heavily on Steven Spielberg’s E.T., and while the original is a classic worth revisiting a zillion times, it was short of one asset that KMG boasted of: Hrithik Roshan. At this stage in his career, Hrithik was still delivering inconsistent performances on screen. Under the directorship of his father, he was uniformly out of this world (emoting with sensitivity, dancing like a dream, his looks and body captured by the camera with affection, not infatuation); but he was prone to over-acting in films directed by others. I remember asking him about this in an interview for Headlines Today and his reply was: Then perhaps all directors should handle their stars with the same love that a father gives to his son.

Fortunately since then Hrithik has been living up to his potential in the able hands of some non-Roshan directors too, most especially Ashutosh Gowariker and Zoya Akhtar. That’s now. In the year 2003 though, KMG was a much-needed reminder of how good his best could be; a reminder that was desperately required considering his embarrassingly over-the-top performance in Sooraj Barjatya’s Main Prem Ki Diwani Hoon in the same year. In addition to Hrithik and Jadoo, Koi… Mil Gaya also had heart, soul, good songs, sweet children, humour and melodrama in just the right proportion, making it a quality commercial film.

Krrish: There are two ways of looking at the second film in this series. You could either say, “If Rakesh Roshan couldn’t financially afford to have action and special effects throughout the film, then he shouldn’t have made Krrish,” or you could appreciate that he came up with a script logically requiring action and special effects only in the second half, thus making his budget more achievable. Better to have world-class SFX in part of the film, than have mediocre SFX throughout its running time. There were no quality compromises on that front in Krrish. The story of an Indian superhero who could fly through the air and jump from skyscraper to skyscraper was original enough to be more than just “an Indian Superman”. The son of Rohit from Koi… Mil Gaya was a beautiful physical specimen of humanity named Krrishna (a.k.a. Krrish in his superhero avatar), the stunts – when they did enter the picture – were well designed and executed, the songs were still enjoyable, the emotions were still very much in place without being maudlin and it was still all-round fun. One complaint: why cast a star of Priyanka Chopra’s calibre and stature if you don’t want to make her character an equal partner? Ah well, if you’re a heroine in this male-dominated industry, chances are that that’s the story of your life. That being said, the truth is that the superhero genre in Hollywood too is the domain of male chauvinism and male-centricity. Sadly, Rakesh Roshan chose not to be an exception in that respect.

In our country, it’s somehow considered terribly unfashionable – and highly un-intellectual – to praise Bollywood while comparing it to Hollywood. Excuse me for not caring. Krrish was released in the same year as Bryan Singer’s murderously dull Superman Returns starring Brandon Routh. According to Wikipedia, Singer had a budget of $204 million to work with whereas Krrish was made at a cost of Rs 45 crore (approximately $6.9 million at current exchange rates). Oddly enough, the quality of Singer’s action and special effects was no better than Krrish. That can’t be the reason to like Krrish though. The happy fact is that even without the benefit of a comparison with Superman Returns, even when viewed in isolation, Krrish is a rollicking good entertainer.

Krrish 3: For me personally, the choice between Koi… Mil Gaya and Krrish is tough. I can tell you without stopping to think for a second though that the writing of Krrish 3 is a big climbdown from both its predecessors. Since I reviewed Film 3 on this blog just a few weeks back, I won’t go into details, but it goes without saying that Krrish 3 is my least favourite film in this series. For my reasons, do click on this link and read my review.

Well, that’s it from me for the moment. The next poll is now up: Taking into account star performances from Bollywood in the box-office successes of the past year, if Deepika Padukone was to be given the Best Actress Award for 2013, which film should she win it for? Do cast your vote.

Warm regards,

Anna

Photographs courtesy: (a) The Wikipedia pages of Koi… Mil Gaya and Krrish (b) Krrish 3 courtesy Everymedia PR

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

POLL 3: BEBO VS ASH VS SRK VS SALMAN VS SHAHID VS …

Kareena Kapoor with co-star Imran Khan in Gori Tere Pyaar Mein:
you voted for her fans as being the most active on Internet

Dear Readers,

If I don’t post this blog right away, I’m afraid @Kareena_No1 on Twitter will have me hung, drawn and quartered. My apologies. I’ve been busy, so I’m just sitting down to discuss this poll question I had asked you earlier this month:

WHICH BOLLYWOOD STAR HAS THE MOST ACTIVE FANS ON THE NET?

Here’s how you voted:

34% of you believe Kareena Kapoor Khan has the most active fans on the Internet.

25% believe it’s Aishwarya Rai Bachchan.

15% picked Shahid Kapoor fans.

7% of you voted for Rani Mukerji’s fans.

4% each believe that Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone’s fans are most active on the Net.

3% Salman Khan’s fans.

2% Priyanka Chopra’s fans.

1% Amitabh Bachchan’s fans.

Those who didn’t get any votes at all: fans of Ranbir Kapoor, Preity Zinta, Aamir Khan, Madhuri Dixit-Nene, Akshay Kumar, John Abraham, Hrithik Roshan, Sonam Kapoor, Katrina Kaif.

MY TAKE:

If you were to go by the raging battles on the social media, it would seem that Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan are the Bollywood stars who have the most active fans on the Internet. Yet, it’s Amitabh Bachchan who has the largest and/or fastest-growing number of followers on most platforms (7.2 million followers on Twitter, 6.9 million likes on FB as I write this post) – and if you follow such things closely you will see his fans too are quick to zero in on anyone seeming remotely critical of him.

From personal experience I can tell you that the most overwhelmingly positive response I’ve ever got to a query on Twitter has been from Rani Mukerji fans. When I was hosting an interview show for Headlines Today till three years back, I used to have a Twitter section in which I’d ask my guest questions sent to me by people following me on Twitter. No stars’ fans have ever flooded me with as many questions and messages as Rani’s fans would when I’d alert them about an interview. They sent me so many tweets for one particular show, that when I printed them out it came to 35 pages! This was about 5 years back, Rani was already floundering in the industry at the time and it was clear that her decision to stick primarily to Yashraj Films’ projects combined with the industry’s tendency to tire easily of heroines had damaged her career, possibly irreparably. From her fans’ messages though, it was evident that there was a hunger among them to see her in more films and in substantial roles. The experience of that interview with Rani set my mind ticking so I checked the Twitter account of her contemporary Preity Zinta whose acting career was clearly pretty much over by then. The numbers were startling: she has 2.6 million followers as of now with not a single film in hand and none in sight, and even today they remain a very active community. Again, from the messages being sent to her, it was clear that there was a hardcore fan following yearning to see her in more films and solid roles.

On a not-so-positive note, when I first joined Twitter, I found the fans who tried to intimidate me the most were Salman Khan fans – back then they’d pick on every single tweet I posted on Bollywood heroes and allege an anti-Salman bias for the most laughable reasons, I assume to put me on the defensive. Was I doing something wrong, I wondered? This is obviously exactly the question they wanted me to ask myself. I was reviewing films for Headlines Today at the time and for weeks before a Salman film’s release, they’d start sending tweets of this sort: We know you media are all pro-SRK and anti-Salman so it goes without saying you will give Bhai’s film a bad review. After a while I began to realise that this was a psychological game to influence critics who might consequently, at a sub-conscious level, hesitate to give a negative review even if they were genuinely unfavourably inclined towards a particular Salman film. Was I being singled out for such attention? Was I flattering myself that people thought I mattered enough to be targeted with such mind games? Fearing that my ego was getting the better of me, I visited the Twitter accounts of critics from rival channels and newspapers and found that they were all being similarly targeted, some mildly as I was, and some rather viciously.

Then when Guzaarish was released and I happened to tweet my thoughts about the film I had my most unpleasant experience ever on Twitter. Fans of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Hrithik Roshan bombarded me with tweets threatening all forms of violence including rape and murder on me and my family, while directing the most vile abuse at me, my family and my organisation. I immediately visited the Twitter accounts of critics from two rival channels and whaddyaknow: the very Twitter handles that were attacking me that day were writing to both of them with the exact same threats and abuse. That’s when I devised my personal social media policy (for want of a better word) that I intend to practice for all time to come: NEVER REPLY TO ABUSE AND THREATS. It helped. In time I found that abusers melted away. I’d like to assume with Gandhian conviction that this happened because there is limited satisfaction to be derived from cursing and threatening a person who refuses to respond. Now I find the people on my followers list are primarily interesting film buffs with whom one can engage in a sensible conversation; the insecure, verbally violent sort rarely bother me now.

Question is: from personal experience, do I conclude that the Bollywood stars with the most active fans on the Internet are Salman, Rani, Aishwarya and Hrithik? Not necessarily. First, I believe it is unfair to gauge the fan activity of male and female stars with the same barometer. It is an achievement for the female stars and a measure of their extreme charisma (which the industry does not fully tap) that they have such massive fan followings considering that they almost never get the kind of larger-than-life roles that the men get. Second, the heavy activity among female stars’ fans shows a keenness to see them in the sort of projects that made them stars in the first place. Goes without saying, there are not enough such projects going around. After a while, the enthusiasm of the fan followings is bound to dwindle. Third, a star may have active fans on the Net even without being personally present on any web platform. Aishwarya, Kareena, Katrina, Rani and Ranbir are proof of that. Fourth, numbers don’t necessarily indicate activity, which is why when I uploaded this poll, I urged readers to read the question carefully. To my mind – and this is purely from observation – though Bachchan fans are extremely active on the Net, fans of SRK and Salman are even more so, possibly because Bachchan’s numerous projects are still the sort that one would see in a star’s second innings whereas SRK and Salman are right now at their peak. What about fans of the third Khan? Well, though Aamir is a massive star, he himself is relatively indifferent to the Net therefore the other two end up scoring over him in this respect. On the other hand, because of the kind of projects SRK and Salman choose, the kind of fan Shah Rukh attracts is more likely to be already active on the Net and able to articulate their views in comparison with the average Salman fan (not all, but most, please note). My guesstimate – which, incidentally, mirrors the analysis of the film industry too – is that Shah Rukh and Aamir fans have similar profiles while Salman and Akshay fans have similar profiles in terms of education, background and so on. 

My vote therefore:

Among the female stars, I’d say the ones with the most active fans on the Net (in this order) are: (1) Aishwarya Rai Bachchan (2) Priyanka Chopra (3) Rani Mukerji (4) Kareena Kapoor Khan (5) Deepika Padukone

Among the male stars, I’d estimate this order of fan activity: (1) Shah Rukh Khan (2) Salman Khan (3) Amitabh Bachchan (4) Akshay Kumar (5) Shahid Kapoor

Signing off now. Do vote in the next poll which will soon be up. 

Warm regards,

Anna


Photograph courtesy: Everymedia PR