Release date:
|
May 23,
2014
|
Director:
|
Soundarya
Rajinikanth Ashwin
|
Cast:
Language:
|
Rajinikanth, Deepika Padukone, Nasser, Jackie Shroff, R.
Sarathkumar, Shobhana
Released in multiple languages including Tamil, Telugu, Hindi.
This is a review of the Hindi version.
|
Kochadaiiyaan is lazy.
You can’t assume that a film will be effective merely because it crosses a new
frontier in technology and stars an acting legend. That, unfortunately, is what
debutant director Soundarya Rajinikanth Ashwin has done in her wannabe epic featuring
a 3D animated version of her superstar father.
The film’s problems begin
with its weak, unimaginative writing by K.S. Ravikumar. His story is narrated to such confusing effect, that I need to
pause a moment before recounting it here... Kochadaiiyaan
is about Rana Rannvijay (Rajinikanth), the young army chief of the kingdom
of Kottaipatinam, who avenges the killing of his father Kochadaiiyaan (also
Rajini) at the hands of the king (Nasser). There is a back story about how
Kochadaiiyaan had been compelled to leave his troops in the care of the rival
King Mahendra (Jackie Shroff) of Kalingpuri; and an opening half about how Rana
grew up and freed those enslaved soldiers by duping Mahendra. This rather
unexciting tale could have been told in a linear fashion, but instead goes back
and forth in time, possibly to build up an artificial air of mystery,
complexity and depth.
Somewhere
in between is a romance between Rana and Kottaipatinam’s Princess Vadhana
(Deepika Padukone) on the one hand, while the prince and Rana’s sister too are
in love with each other. Rana also has a brother (Rajini again). Frankly, the
whole thing feels like an insipid potpourri drawn from many sources with not a
single engaging character to its credit.
Much of
this could have been forgiven if the performance capture had been top notch. Sadly,
it’s not. As you know, performance capture is used to replicate the
movements of live actors to create animated characters. James Cameron resorted
to this technology to generate the Na’vi people of planet Pandora in his
pathbreaking 2009 film Avatar. Steven
Spielberg used it in 2011’s The
Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn to bring
alive the young Belgian detective, Captain Haddock, Thomson, Thompson and
others exactly as they’d been visualised by the artist Herge in his comics
series. Here in India, the first reported use of performance capture in a
full-length feature was in the 2012 Tamil action thriller Maattran which required the technology to, in a sense, clone Suriya
since he was playing conjoined twins. Kochadaiiyaan is the first
Indian film to be entirely in 3D performance capture. Like Tintin, it’s fully animated.
The films I
listed above all had specific reasons for turning to this technology. For
instance, it would have been impossible to find live actors who look precisely
like Herge’s drawings of the characters in his iconic comic books. Likewise,
the Na’vi were figments of human imagination. Nothing in the story of Kochadaiiyaan particularly cries out for
the use of performance capture though – unless you count the need to make
Rajinikanth look decades younger than his real age, but then isn’t that
something Rajini works towards in every one of his films these days? So why use
performance capture when live actors would do just as well?
If the replication
had been successful and visually enriching, it could have been argued that this
still-evolving technology was used simply to push the envelope. That argument
doesn’t hold since most of the characters in Kochadaiiyaan appear stiff, strained and far less attractive than
their live avatars. The dialogue delivery is okay but the lip synching to songs
is terrible.
This is not
to say that Hollywood’s use of performance capture has been a smooth ride. The Adventures of Tintin, for instance, was
a spectacular eye-full and Captain Haddock looked delightfully real but Tintin
himself was rather flat. Soundarya’s film
has hardly any redeeming factors though. Kochadaiiyaan himself does a nice
taandav at one point and Rajini’s characters do mirror the actor’s trademark
swagger to amusing effect, but all three are slow on their feet and left me
longing for the real Superstar who can flip sunglasses and cigarettes, walk on
walls and ceilings, and race atop trains. When Vadhana dances at one point, she
looks so awkward that I found myself longing for the natural grace of the real
live Deepika Padukone. So why use performance capture when live actors would
have served the purpose better?
Shobhana as
the late Kochadaiiyaan’s wife and Jackie Shroff as King Mahendra are the only
bright spots in this rather dreary picture. In fact, when Shobhana dances in
the film (the camera angles are most flattering in this scene), I felt a
different kind of longing; a longing to see her more often in substantial
roles, of the kind that are rarely offered to gorgeous 40-plus women in Indian
cinema.
On the other hand, when in
one brief scene Vadhana is shown kissing Rana, I was glad that this was an
animated film using the likenesses of Deepika and Rajinikanth. Imagine a live
action film featuring a real smooch between the 28-year-old actress and her
63-year-old co-star! Erm…
This is a review of the
Hindi Kochadaiiyaan with an
introductory narration by Amitabh Bachchan. If the Tamil version – also
released here in Delhi – had subtitles, I’d have preferred to watch that
because even the worst Rajini film is worth watching in a hall filled with
crazed Rajini fans cheering, repeating dialogues and serving up more
entertainment than what’s on screen. No such luck with Hindi film buffs who’re
not that into Rajini – two rows of them in an otherwise empty hall watched in
cold silence with me. Kochadaiiyaan is
a dull film. The direction is lackadaisical, the editing shoddy and abrupt in
places. Even the usually reliable A.R. Rahman’s music is uninspiring. Besides,
when the real Rajini is available, why on earth should I settle for three stodgy
animated duplicates?
Rating (out of five stars): *1/2
CBFC Rating (India):
|
U
|
Running time:
|
119
minutes
|
Poster
courtesy: Everymedia PR
the animation is very good, especially they have done well to match the faces of actors
ReplyDeleteI am sorry, but uninspiring music from A R Rahman ? He was the real saviour of the film I felt. The variety was pleasing as a music enthusiast for me. I agree the visuals weren't befitting enough, but my ears didn't really complain.
ReplyDeleteSimple reason: To build a animation Rajini legend which lives forever even after the real Rajini stops acting. Isn't the reason so obvious?
ReplyDeleteIs not charlie chaplin iconified and still lives in animation or Mr.Bean?
How can you say Rahman's music is uninspiring. Were you watching with your ear buds on? I still cannot digest your review. Wasted 5 mins of my lifetime. Better Luck next time!
ReplyDeletePathetic sense you have!! wasted my tym reading this Ohhhh pity!!
ReplyDeleteDont know how songs sound in hindi,it might be bad probably lik most of the dubbed songs.but it is a delight to hear them in tamil.they were the only redeeming feature in the whole film
ReplyDelete