Release date (India):
|
February 20, 2015
|
Director:
|
Sriram Raghavan
|
Cast:
Language:
|
Varun Dhawan,
Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Yami Gautam, Huma Qureshi, Radhika Apte, Divya Dutta, Kumud
Mishra, Zakir Hussain, Vinay Pathak
Hindi
|
“Don’t Miss The
Beginning” is not just a promotional tagline we saw in the trailer. As it turns
out, Badlapur: Don’t Miss The Beginning
is the full title you will see on the Censor certificate and opening credit
plate of director Sriram Raghavan’s latest cinematic offering.
It’s almost like an
announcement and you’d better believe it, because the first 10-15 minutes of
this film are perfectly edited, intelligently directed and very cleverly
written. I think I stopped breathing for part of that time, initially caught up
in intrigued anticipation, then in utter shock and then overwhelmed with
curiosity about what might follow.
Sadly, the rest of the
film doesn’t match up. The primary reason is that the denouement is anti-climactic.
Badlapur also needed to quicken its
pace and take a surgeon’s knife to its flab.
The aim appears to have
been to create a ruminative, calm and collected thriller. It might have worked
too if so many well-crafted scenes raising expectations weren’t followed by
dampeners. This is a disappointment for those of us who loved Raghavan’s excellently paced Ek
Hasina Thi and Johnny Gaddaar
(let’s pretend we never saw Agent Vinod).
Here’s how Badlapur goes. A
bright young Pune-based ad executive called Raghu (Varun Dhawan) loses his
family to two bank robbers. One escapes the police while the other is caught, refuses
to reveal his accomplice’s name and is sentenced to 20 years in prison. As
Raghu unravels before our eyes, three questions seem designed keep us viewers hooked:
Why did this criminal give
up his liberty rather than give up his partner in crime?
Why did he choose (yes
he actually chose) to be the one who is caught of the two?
Did he have a specific
plan that would benefit him more than his abettor?
You may accept that the answer
to Question 1 is: loyalty, with a resultant financial pay-off being the light at the end of that dark tunnel. You may assume,
once you’ve watched the post-interval portion, that the answer to Question 2
is: Liak (Nawazuddin Siddiqui) was sure Harman (Vinay Pathak) would buckle
under the pressure of a police interrogation or prison. Fair enough. The utter let-down
is the answer – or the lack of it – to Question 3.
Where Badlapur
gets things right though, it really gets it right: that introduction; the
strength of the writing when the going is good (a pity about those intermittent
troughs); Sachin-Jigar’s songs; and some wicked editing between murders that
leaves the audience briefly confused.
Siddiqui rules. The man just outdoes
himself in each scene. Badlapur is
his master class in acting. The supporting cast too is amazing, in particular
that lovely girl Radhika Apte who we need to see more in Bollywood, Pathak, Kumud
Mishra and Zakir Hussain who shines though he gets just a few minutes on screen.
In fact, a Siddiqui-Hussain face-off is Badlapur’s best scene.
As for Varun Dhawan, no,
I will not say he is a pleasant surprise because it was clear from Student of the Year (SOTY) that both he and Sid Malhotra were
capable of much more than fluff (Alia Bhatt proved herself only subsequently). Dhawan
doesn’t yet have the depth of his co-stars in Badlapur but it’s clear that he’s got the potential to grow into that
depth. He has also evidently worked hard to largely subsume that cutesy drawl
with which he speaks naturally and which is fine in bubblegum pop cinema but
not in a grittier film like Badlapur.
It is a joy to see that this young star, with a triad of box-office hits in the
young romance genre – SOTY (2012), Main Tera Hero (2014), Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania (2014) – is
keen to expand his repertoire and range.
The only point at which
the director becomes slightly conscious that Dhawan is a star with teen fans leads
to an entirely superfluous moment in which Raghu needlessly strips off his
shirt to display a deliciously ripped torso and arms, right before he commits an
act of extreme violence.
SPOILER AHEAD
A more troublesome superfluous
moment comes during the song-and-dance accompanying the closing credits, during
which Huma Qureshi throws come-hither looks at Dhawan, which is jarring since Raghu
had repeatedly raped her character, a sex worker called Jhimli/Shabnam. Why does
Bollywood so often divorce the closing songs of films from the preceding story?
In this instance, was Team Badlapur being
thoughtless? Or can it be that they take rape lightly? Or do they, like so many others,
believe that assaulting a sex worker is not as heinous as raping other women? Odd,
because Raghavan showed such sensitivity towards his heroine in Ek Hasina Thi.
Badlapur then is inconsistent, often praiseworthy, too often not,
occasionally even tacky – oh why wasn’t that aspiring-to-be-profound game of
Scrabble scissored out?! The film raises some interesting questions about what vengeance
does to those who seek it. It also boasts of many memorable scenes peopled with
brilliant actors. The overall feeling though is one of a sporadically,
episodically effective film that doesn’t quite add up.
Rating (out of five): **1/2
CBFC Rating (India):
|
A
|
Running time:
|
135 minutes
|
Trailer courtesy: Everymedia PR
Seriously? "Why does Bollywood so often divorce the closing songs of films from the preceding story? In this instance, was Team Badlapur being thoughtless? Or can it be that they take rape lightly? Or do they, like so many others, believe that assaulting a sex worker is not as heinous as raping other women? Odd, because Raghavan showed such sensitivity towards his heroine in Ek Hasina Thi." - I doubt they thought so much into it - they had a good song that they wanted to put into a video and they did, what's the big deal? No need to read more into it than what is already there.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous,
DeleteSo you say "what's the big deal?" about a film maker's nonchalance towards rape? I'm afraid I think it's a huge deal.
Regards,
Fair enough if you feel so - but the point I am trying to make is that it's not nonchalance towards rape - the two are not connected - there is a particular situation in a film, then there is a promotional song video - the two are completely different things with completely different intentions - just because the actions/relationships in the film are not reflected in the promo song doesn't mean nonchalance towards rape which is what I meant by "what's the big deal?" - the fact that you perceive this to be nonchalance towards rape is what I disagreed with, not a filmmakers nonchalance towards rape being a big deal. The two are distinctly different things.
Deletehoney!you do not understand cinema..i know there are no qualifications needed to be a film critic but then,being just a cinema lover cannot make you a film critic!watch more movies before claiming to be a movie critic..also,stop being one of those feminists in the garb of a film critic..it really is very annoying!cheers :)
ReplyDelete