Release date:
|
January 8, 2016
|
Director:
|
Bejoy Nambiar
|
Cast:
Language:
|
Amitabh Bachchan,
Farhan Akhtar, Manav Kaul, Aditi Rao Hydari, Seema Pahwa, Guest appearance:
John Abraham
Hindi
|
It is ironic that Wazir feels like a quickie at the
writing desk. I say ironic because at the premiere in Delhi, producer Vidhu
Vinod Chopra announced that it had taken 6 years to write this film; and
director Bejoy Nambiar further informed the audience that the seed of the story
had been conceptualised by Vinod 35 years back when Bejoy was a one-year-old.
Oddly enough,
despite all the time spent on it, the cornerstone of the script is a shunya. (Warning: some people may consider what follows a spoiler.) Here
is a fundamental point: if you are so evil and conscienceless as to be capable
of multiple murders and also capable of murdering your only eyewitness’ only
confidant, why would you risk letting that eyewitness herself live? She is,
after all, a ticking time bomb.
I asked my
companion at the preview this question. She replied: the murderer needed the
eyewitness alive to keep alive his pretence of being who he is. Counter: no he
did not; once he had established that pretence, the eyewitness could very well
have slipped on a banana peel, fallen down a flight of steps, been struck by a
fatal disease or been the victim of any similar carefully contrived ‘accident’
or ‘natural cause’. (Spoiler alert
ends.)
Poof! There goes
your entire edifice.
Readers won’t
understand the full import of the previous three paragraphs until after
watching the film. Point is, the basic premise of this political thriller is
ill conceived and hollow.
That is a crying
shame, because Wazir features some
important positives.
This is a story of
two parents connecting over a shared loss. Farhan Akhtar plays a dutiful Delhi
policeman called Daanish Ali mourning his child’s death and the strain this
places on his relationship with his wife, the Kathak dancer Ruhana (Aditi Rao
Hydari). Amitabh Bachchan is the chess guru, Pandit Omkarnath Dhar, whose
daughter died tragically.
Although Wazir falls flat on its face as a
thriller when you consider the question posed earlier in this review, it does
work in other departments.
First, its initial
half hour is energetic without being hurried, neatly handled, taut and very
very poignant. The remarkably well-filmed shootout in that portion is
especially worth mentioning. Bejoy, he of Shaitan
and David fame, is good at this
stuff. Remember the exquisitely executed sequence of chaos and gunfire set to
the classic song Khoya khoya chand in
Shaitan?
Second, fatherhood
and husbandhood, not of the authoritarian variety, but of the emotionally
invested kind, are not adequately covered by mainstream Hindi cinema. It is
therefore both moving and refreshing to see the exploration of Daanish and
Omkarnath’s agony, and the manner in which they lean on each other for solace.
There is more to
men than bombast and fisticuffs, you know, Bollywood. Men can express feelings
without screaming and delivering speeches. Men can love without being stalkers
and pests. Men ache for their wives. Men too cradle their babies in their arms
and hold them to their bosoms. Men have bosoms. Men feel hurt. Men weep.
In this context,
Farhan is a particular joy to watch as Daanish. His character is brimming with
emotions yet the actor’s performance is restrained. As it happens, he looks
lovely too.
Amitabh – in a
departure from his immersive turn in his last screen outing Piku – unfortunately chooses to play
Amitabh Bachchan rather than a character in Wazir.
Still, one of the high points of the film is seeing him in the closing song
shot on the two male leads in a recording studio, when you cannot help but be
aware that you are witnessing a legend at work, relaxed in the company of a
younger artiste and enjoying himself so thoroughly while he is at it.
Aditi has little to
do beyond look great and look vulnerable in the film. She does both well, but
the woman who starred in Delhi 6, Yeh Saali Zindagi and London, Paris, New York deserves better.
Manav Kaul, an otherwise excellent actor, suffers the worst of the film’s
writing, playing a politician called Yezaad Qureshi with glaringly obvious
motivations.
The grand surprise
of the film, the titular character, is nicely acted by Neil Nitin Mukesh. Why
on earth does this young star not do more films?
As for the rest,
well, Wazir has polished production
values, very attractive art design, pretty – even if too many – songs and it
briefly travels to a state that we ought to see more in our films, Jammu and
Kashmir.
Considering that
Vinod is the producer of Lage Raho Munna
Bhai (one of the best, most cerebral commercial Hindi films ever made) and 3 Idiots (one of the Mumbai film
industry’s biggest box-office successes till date), and considering that his
co-writer here is Abhijat Joshi, who has been a co-writer on Lage Raho, 3 Idiots and PK, the
glaring plot loophole in Wazir is
thoroughly disappointing. It is disappointing too that the truth about the
film’s third father-daughter relationship can be seen coming from a mile. Both
elements combined make the second half of Wazir
far far less intriguing, intelligent and engaging than the first.
Still, Daanish’s
quest for the Wazir makes for an interesting ride. The selling point of the
film though, is the bonding between Daanish and Omkarnath, two grieving
fathers, two husbands in pain. We need more of that from Bollywood.
Rating
(out of five): **1/2
CBFC Rating (India):
|
U/A
|
Running time:
|
103 minutes
|
This review has also been published on
firstpost:
Poster 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wazir_(film)
What about John Abraham in the movie? You didn't comment on his character or performance. Is it that forgettable?
ReplyDeleteThere were several members of the cast I did not comment on, Jaspreet. Can't mention everyone and every single element -- if I did, the review would never end, no? John had a very small role in the film, a guest appearance as we Indians like to call it when a major star does a teeny cameo :) He was effective in it, looked great as always, but he was there for perhaps a minute which is why I didn't elaborate on his role in the review. BTW it's a role that I can't describe anyway without giving away a part of the story I don't want to reveal. Hope this helps :) Anna
DeleteJust watched it.... and you nailed the review, Anna. Couldn't agree more.
ReplyDelete