Saturday, February 24, 2024

Manjummel Boys: Thinly written, inconsistent but ultimately rewarding survival drama (Review 797)

Release date:

February 22, 2024

Director:

Chidambaram

Cast:

Soubin Shahir, Sreenath Bhasi, Deepak Parambol, Chandu Salimkumar, Khalidh Rahman, Ganapathi S. Poduval, Balu Varghese, Abhiram Radhakrishnan, Arun Kurian, Lal Jr, Vishnu Reghu 

Language:

Malayalam with Tamil 

 


Jeevithathil stuck aayitulla paara.” That’s how one of the key players in the new Malayalam film Manjummel Boys, describes a precariously poised, giant boulder that he sees while wandering around Kodaikanal in Tamil Nadu with a gaggle of man-children. His words are appropriately poetic and thoughtful for the setting, in a departure from the gang’s unruliness and loudness until then. The contrast is emblematic of the effect that nature can have on even the most restless of humans, and offers an insight into what Manjummel Boys might have been if it had lived up to the potential of its premise all the way. As things stand, this survival thriller cum coming-of-age saga is outstanding in part yet thinly written and inconsistently toned for the most part. 

 

Manjummel Boys features an ensemble of boisterous buddies – all of them men, all barring one of them young, all of them old enough to be deemed terribly immature for their age – in a decade before cellphones and social media had flooded our world. Manjummel is the name of a locality in Kochi with which the ‘boys’ christen themselves. Their wayward existence is disrupted by a tragic turn of events during their hill station sojourn that tests their spirit and their relationships. 

 

The film is written and directed by Chidambaram who notched up a hit with his directorial debut Jan-E-Man. The latter smoothly and effectively combined a sense of humour with grim themes such as depression, separation and death. Manjummel Boys aims at a drastic shift in mood from light-heartedness at first to utter gloom tempered by hope, but without the same finesse.

 

The narrative kicks off by introducing us to the rambunctiousness and camaraderie of these men-who-are-still-boys. The friends are captured making merry at a wedding, engaged in fun and games including a bout of tug of war, hanging out, planning an out-station trip, and at last, actually making that trip. This goes on for what feels like an endless stretch replete with clichés that are rampant in Malayalam male bonding chronicles. In these passages, they shout at rather than speak to each other, noise is used as a substitute for substance and storytelling verve, and precious length that could have been spent on character development is squandered away. 

 

For the record, it is not essential for survival flicks to create character arcs before the high drama of the central plot takes over. The point here is that Chidambaram does spend a lot of time with the ‘boys’ before disaster strikes, but does not make effective use of that period. Later, it becomes clear that their activities in that portion foreshadowed their actions in the second half, and showcasing their layaboutery early on was a way of stressing their strength of character later on. Too bad that this was done through repetitive, formulaic scenes shorn of depth. 

 

There are lots of familiar faces and names in this crowd: Sreenath BhasiSoubin Shahir (who is also one of the producers), Deepak Parambol, Ganapathi S. Poduval, Arun Kurian, Balu Varghese and Abhiram Radhakrishnan among them. Half these characters would have been indistinguishable from each other if they weren’t played by recognisable actors.  

 


After much yelling and posing around at scenic spots, towards the end of their stay in Kodaikanal the group decide on a last-minute stop before heading home. Their destination is Devil’s Kitchen a.k.a. Guna Cave, nicknamed after the Tamil cult classic Gunaa (1991) starring Kamal Haasan and Roshni that was shot there. The men continue to act idiotically, but now Chidambaram thankfully also finds space for calm as Shyju Khalid’s camera roams around in awe of the mountains, running its eye over and between rock faces, deep into caves and high above the land, examining the dramatic arrangements of trees and rocks engineered by natural forces. 

 

The tiresome scenes that preceded Manjummel Boys’ arrival at Guna Cave become a distant memory when an accident caused by the men’s irresponsible conduct turns their holiday into a nightmare. The shock of that turning point, the suspense and technical accomplishments of the film from then on – intelligent sound design by Shijin Hutton and Abhishek Nair, and intelligent use of Sushin Shyam’s music complementing the cinematographer’s imaginative exploration of the location – compensate for the continuing limitations in the writing. 

 

In short, Manjummel Boys is an uneven experience. On the one hand, the shooting of the Guna Cave area and the treatment of the twist are impeccable. On the other hand, the scripting continues to be patchy and unsophisticated. The first flashback to the characters’ childhood leading into their  behaviour in desperate circumstances in Kodaikanal is well done. But it gets predictable when it happens again, and then again when their seemingly purposeless shenanigans before the interval come of use in rescue operations. 

 

The last half hour is packed with nail-biting tension despite this. 

 

Manjummel Boys is challenging for another reason. Malayalam and Tamil are fitted naturally into the script, but there were no subtitles played in the hall in Delhi where I watched it. While this could have been the multiplex management’s mess-up (even when producers subtitle their films, theatres in Delhi very often don’t bother to play the subs), a question remains for the makers themselves: since Manjummel Boys’ primary language is Malayalam, why are Malayalam subtitles not embedded in the print itself throughout the Tamil dialogues (in the way they are in one portion depicting characters in Tamil Nadu regaling the visitors from Kerala with lore surrounding Guna Cave, its recent history and mythology)? In its present shape, the film is inaccessible not only to non-Malayalam speakers in that particular hall, it is tough even for Malayalam speakers who do not know Tamil.

 

The Malayalam film industry does not often visit the survival genre, and on those rare outings it has a mixed tracked record. Helen (2019) and Malayankunju (2018) are recent examples that got it right. Like these two, most survival films tend to be intense studies of human nature. They need not be. Manjummel Boys’ problem is that it is not satisfied with action and suspense alone. It wants to be profound but can only partially pull it off. For one, the tribute to Gunaa has not been thought through. If the iconic Tamil film was merely the motivation that spurs the ‘boys’ of Manjummel to visit Guna Cave it would have made sense. However, pointed references are made to Gunaa through song and dialogue that gradually draws a parallel between the pivotal relationship in the earlier film and the willingness of the ‘boys’ here to give up their lives for each other in the end. But Gunaa was not about a healthy love or friendship, it was about unhealthy obsession and delusion. Kamal’s character in that film was mentally unwell, he abducted a woman with whom he believed he had a divine connection, and ultimately preferred death over life without her. To evoke nostalgia for the lovely music of that film is all very well, but the concerted mindless effort to evoke nostalgia for the ‘love’ and ‘sacrifice’ in Gunaa makes Manjummel Boys both intellectually pretentious and intellectually lightweight.

 

Text on screen post-climax reveals that Manjummel Boys is based on the true story of a bravery award winner called Siju David. Knowing that what happened at Guna Cave in Manjummel Boys actually happened in real life adds a layer of chills to the better half of this flawed, partly rewarding film. 

 

Rating (out of 5 stars): 2.5   

 

Running time:

135 minutes 

 

Visual courtesy: IMDB  

10 comments:

  1. Your review is oscillating bn goodness nd incapabailities. At EOD, it's what th audience take back with them. I think the movie was successful on that note , love going beyond all constraints.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ‘…tough for Malayalam speakers who do not know Tamil.’ Well, there’s hardly any Malayalam speaker who does not know Tamil, most of them — at least those living in Kerala — being at least receptively comfortable with the language. Tamil being translated for them might be seen as a bit patronising.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not true that there's "hardly any Malayalam speaker" out there who does not know Tamil. As a Malayalam speaker myself, I am sure of that. Even if this were true, why should Malayalam speakers who do understand Tamil have a problem with a film being made more accessible to those who do not?

      Delete
    2. It felt like a deliberate attempt to me . Apart from that whole explanation part, rest of the Tamil dialogues were understandable from the contexts. And this air of uncertainty, the confusion arising from language barrier was a big trouble the boys felt and by not having the Malayalam subtitle, the audience also get to experience it, atleast the Malayalam audience coz in other languages they have subtitles.

      I find this aspect intriguing... The idea that your experience connects with your understanding of Tamil. It just clarify that you're relating to the boys and not the police

      Delete
    3. The very fact that the 'boys' from Kerala in this film cannot understand what is being said to them in Tamil disproves your contention that "there’s hardly any Malayalam speaker who does not know Tamil". I did consider the possibility that (as you say in your second message), the filmmaker intentionally didn't give Malayalam subtitles for most of the Tamil dialogues so that the audience could share the 'boys' confusion arising from the language barrier, but keep in mind that when you propose this theory, you are acknowledging that there is indeed a language barrier. Also, if this was the filmmaker's intention, then firstly, there were just too many Tamil lines in the dialogues; and second, by this yardstick, there should have been no Malayalam subs for the detailed explanation that was given about the history of the Guna Caves. Those Malayalam subs were embedded in the print, so clearly the filmmaker realises that not all Malayalam speakers understand Tamil, and he wanted to ensure that his primary audience does not miss the meaning of this crucial portion of the film, in case theatres don't play the English subtitles, which is something they often forget to do.

      Delete
  3. Ah, this review aged well, didn't it? 🙂

    I'm not blaming the reviewer, but at times one may not capture the full sense of the movie on first watch. I watched this movie twice and on first watch I shared the same opinion on the first half not spending enough with the characters. But the thrills of the second half alone compensates it and should have been more than 2.5 for sure. There is so much the movie got right than wrong.
    And on second watch, I felt the movie was even better than the first watch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Ah this review aged well, didn't it? 🙂" is sarcasm that is worth analysing because it's always good to examine the question: why are some people so under-confident about their understanding of the arts that they are afraid to express an opinion unless they feel the whole world shares it?

      "...one may not capture the full sense of the movie on the first watch" is condescension that masks the same under-confidence.

      Manjummel Boys has gone on to become a hit - so what?

      Extending your stand to other walks of life, once a political party wins an election and comes to power, every citizen, activist and journalist who criticised it before the win should be embarrassed.

      I hope you get over this fear and insecurity someday - and when that day comes, perhaps you will be unafraid to reveal your name while posting a comment online, instead of commenting anonymously.

      Art movements and socio-political campaigns are born because there are enough people in this world who are not afraid, under-confident and insecure about their opinions.

      Regards and thank you,

      Delete
  4. Came here from Rotten Tomatoes. Regarding the comment about the first half not utilizing the time to build character arcs, I feel compelled to add a few things that I noticed on the second watch.

    *** SPOILERS AHEAD ***

    When Kuttan goes to pickup Subhash, he's shown flipping through a book - Mathavum Manushyanum. Subhash is clearly portrayed as a critic of religion and beliefs. And towards the end of the movie when the locals are touching Subhash's feet, the camera points at Kuttan.
    My interpretation of this scene is that we see God in people who reach out a helping hand in trying times.

    I strongly felt that the filmmakers were successful in making me, the viewer, feel like I was part of the boys. Which in turn made the second half more gripping.

    And about the use of excessive noise, that's just how a gang of drunk dudes are gonna act. And I'm in no way advocating for that behavior! You see similar gangs in tourist spots all the time, being a nuisance for the rest of the people. I personally believe that is portrayed very well in the movie.

    Not gonna contest any of your other points as I believe we are all entitled to our own opinions.

    Good day, Anna!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Please ignore previous comment, I selected the wrong account :)

    Came here from Rotten Tomatoes. Regarding the comment about the first half not utilizing the time to build character arcs, I feel compelled to add a few things that I noticed on the second watch.

    *** SPOILERS AHEAD ***

    When Kuttan goes to pickup Subhash, he's shown flipping through a book - Mathavum Manushyanum. Subhash is clearly portrayed as a critic of religion and beliefs. And towards the end of the movie when the locals are touching Subhash's feet, the camera points at Kuttan.
    My interpretation of this scene is that we see God in people who reach out a helping hand in trying times.

    I strongly felt that the filmmakers were successful in making me, the viewer, feel like I was part of the boys. Which in turn made the second half more gripping.

    And about the use of excessive noise, that's just how a gang of drunk dudes are gonna act. And I'm in no way advocating for that behavior! You see similar gangs in tourist spots all the time, being a nuisance for the rest of the people. I personally believe that is portrayed very well in the movie.

    Not gonna contest any of your other points as I believe we are all entitled to our own opinions.

    Good day, Anna!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don't quite agree with some of this critic's review.. The film is based on a real incident.. And so definitely the writer 's constraint would be to write as close as possible to the actual events.. Including the development of the boys' characters. He cannot write as per his imagination. Overall the director, actors and the whole team have done a fantastic job.. Bringing global fame to our Malayalam film industry

    ReplyDelete