Showing posts with label Andrew Garfield. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Garfield. Show all posts

Thursday, May 1, 2014

REVIEW 260: THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 (3D)

Release date:
May 1, 2014
Director:
Marc Webb
Cast:


Language:
Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Sally Field, Dane DeHaan, Paul Giamatti, Dennis Leary
English


There’s a point in last year’s Man of Steel, when Clark Kent in his pre-Superman childhood days uses his superpowers to save another kid from an accident. Much to his confusion, instead of gratitude he evokes fear in that child. “People are scared of what they don’t understand,” his foster father played by Kevin Costner explains to him.

Sometimes, undeterred by that reaction, the object of fear goes on to become Superman, Spiderman or some other enemy of evil; sometimes that reaction combined with self-doubt brings out negativity, as it did with Lizard, the bad guy from the first instalment of this film series, and Electro from The Amazing Spider-man 2.

In a nation where a debate on Section 377 is raging; where politicians in election season are trying hard to net votes by invoking fear of the “other”; where efforts are on to demonise Muslims, secular Hindus, homosexuals, hijras, feminists and anyone whose ideology, personal choices or intrinsic characteristics can be used to paint them as aliens; in such a nation at this point in our history, Electro from The Amazing Spiderman 2 is a telling and poignant villain.

He doesn’t choose to become what he becomes. He is just a brilliant scientist going unnoticed by his colleagues until one day he is bitten by a tank-full of gigantic electric eels and mutates into a human generator of electricity. He didn’t seek out the power that came to him accidentally, nor is it his fault that he doesn’t at first know how to control it. “I just wanted people to see me,” he cries out helplessly when by-standers on the streets of New York react in horror as he himself first becomes aware of his own might as a mutant. But people’s fear compels him to protect himself, and that’s when all hell breaks loose.   

This happens part-way through the film. The Amazing Spider-man 2 starts with a flashback to Peter Parker’s childhood and his parents’ murder. That being dealt with, we are back with Peter (Andrew Garfield) where we’d left him in The Amazing Spider-man: a youngster living with his Aunt May (Sally Field). Peter graduates with his girlfriend Gwen Stacey (Emma Stone) and becomes a photographer whose calling card is that he has provided pictures of Spiderman to The Daily Bugle. Gwen becomes an intern at Oscorp, the company for which Peter’s dad had worked before his death. Remember Oscorp is where Lizard was born when the scientist Curt Connors injected himself with a serum containing genetically modified lizard DNA.

As Spidey continues to fight crime in New York, he’s also battling the worry that his work could some day put Gwen in danger. Meanwhile, his childhood friend Harry Osborne (Dane DeHaan), son of Oscorp founder Norman Osborne, returns to New York and urgently needs to find Spiderman for his own personal reasons. He turns to Peter for help, not knowing the truth about Spidey. It’s also around this time that Electro (Jamie Foxx) is born.

Director Marc Webb efficiently negotiates the multiple strands in the screenplay without allowing it to appear convoluted at any point. American superhero films seem fixated on a powers-being-handed-from-father-to-son narrative, but Aunt May here is no silent spectator. For that matter, Gwen is no sidekick to Spidey either. She’s a feisty equal partner who fires him for daring to take a decision on her behalf in a bid to “protect” her. It is her scientific mind that provides Peter with a solution to combat Electro’s powers. And it is she who is the centre of many of the film’s most touching scenes. Through her we even discover that our Spidey is a feminist, that he’s not one of those guys who expects his girlfriend or wife to follow him across the world wherever his career may take him while she puts her dreams on hold.

Garfield and Stone are both lovely to look at and excellent actors. Their beauty, charm, charisma and undeniable chemistry might have sustained a much thinner screenplay. Here, with the backing of strong writing, they effectively convey to us the romance, companionship, sexual sparks, heartache and heartbreak involved in their relationship. 

The two leads are backed by a supporting cast of wonderful actors though it has to be said that Oscar winner Jamie Foxx is given short shrift. We see little of him in his pre-Electro avatar, and as Electro we can barely decipher his face. Still, that’s not as bad as the embarrassingly insignificant role played by Irrfan Khan in the last film. On another front, it’s sad that superhero films rarely get the attention of awards-givers. If it weren’t for past trends, I’d have put my money on Field getting a bunch of Best Supporting Actress noms by year-end. 

The screenplay of The Amazing Spiderman 2 has considerable depth, but it’s not without its flaws. First, it skims over the reason for Electro’s animosity towards Spiderman. Since we are not drawn into their enmity, that takes away much of the edge from their confrontations. Second, some of the satellite scenes needed to have been better written and directed, such as that awkwardly handled one in Aunt May’s hospital room when the lights come back on and she acts like a boss which in fact she is not, as is evident from an earlier conversation she had with Peter. Third, Garfield and Stone are so much more interesting than Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst who played Spidey and his girlfriend in Sam Raimi’s film series, yet this film like the first Amazing Spider-man, sorely lacks that one defining moment of burning romance akin to that electrifying upside-down kiss in the rain that has immortalised Maguire and Dunst.

TAS2’s special effects and action are top-notch though the music fails to stir. Overall, it is a high-adrenaline experience, zipping from one crest to the next to the next, leaving the viewer with little time to think or complain. In short, The Amazing Spiderman 2 is great fun.

Rating (out of five): ***1/2

CBFC Rating (India):
U/A
Running time:
MPAA Rating (US):
142 minutes
PG-13 (for sequences of sci-fi action/violence)
Release date in the US:
May 2, 2014
Poster and videos courtesy: Sony Pictures Entertainment
“Rise of Electro” video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8qESpVVTfI
Hindi trailer featuring Vivek Oberoi: http://youtu.be/bmrOwxOaV3M 

Friday, June 29, 2012

REVIEW 140: THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (3D)


Release date in India:
June 29, 2012
Director:
Marc Webb
Cast:
Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans, Martin Sheen, Sally Field, Denis Leary, Irrfan Khan   



I bet the question on every Indian’s mind is: has Irrfan Khan been short-changed in The Amazing Spider-Man? Patience, people! Let’s first talk about everything else.

The Amazing Spider-Man takes us back to where it all began. Which means it revisits the initial chapters of the Spidey story that were already brought to us in 2002 by the first of the three films directed by Sam Raimi. Boring, did you say? Actually, no. Raimi’s were fine films but there’s enough difference in the interpretation of the lead character in The Amazing Spider-Man, enough additions, subtractions and nuances to make this a series worth rebooting. So the question is not: why is Sony revisiting the franchise so soon after Raimi’s third outing with Spidey? The question is: when the heck are you folks bringing us The Amazing Spider-Man Part 2?

This film begins with little Peter Parker’s parents abruptly leaving him one night in the care of his Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) and Aunt May (Sally Field). Next we see Peter (Andrew Garfield) as an academically bright teenager and social recluse, bitter about his past, confident enough to take on school bullies even before he gets superpowers yet too reticent to express his feelings for his classmate Gwen Stacey (Emma Stone). One day, Peter visits his scientist father’s former collaborator Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans) whose aim is to regenerate human cells to help him get back his own missing arm and also rid the world of weakness and disability (his choice of words, not mine). At Connors’ lab, Peter is bitten by a genetically modified spider as a result of which he develops arachnid superpowers, thus becoming the masked vigilante, Spiderman.

Part of the fun of watching this film is in playing a game of “Spot The Differences”. In Raimi’s films, Kirsten Dunst plays Spiderman’s love interest Mary Jane Watson. Here in The Amazing Spider-Man, the girlfriend we get is another one of the comic book superhero’s sweethearts. Will Mary Jane appear in later instalments? Equally intriguing are the references to Norman Osborne made by Connors’ boss Dr Rajit Rathi (Irrfan), clearly in a bid to set us up for a sequel. Spidey followers know of course that Osborne – father of Peter’s best friend Harry – was the scientist who turned into Spiderman’s nemesis, Green Goblin, in the comics and in Raimi’s first film.

There are two things I found beautiful about The Amazing Spider-Man: Andrew Garfield’s face; and the dilemmas of the film’s ‘villain’, The Lizard. There is such sensitivity in Garfield’s eyes that you see Peter’s pain in them, you understand the boy’s shyness and the teenaged thrill of discovering that he can crawl on walls. There’s also an interesting sub-text in the casting, since Garfield’s calling card so far has been The Social Network in which he played the intelligent, good-looking guy who is bested by his nerdy, plain-looking classmate; in The Amazing Spider-Man, he’s the New Generation nerd, non-stereotypical, handsome and also a scientific genius!  

I’m not about to tell you how The Lizard comes into being, but this I will say: he’s a tragic figure, not the epitome of evil but a misguided, desperately sad human gone wrong, torn between the goodness and the wretchedness within him. I read that Marc Webb said in an interview: “…Good drama comes from competing ideas of what's good.” That’s the USP of The Amazing Spider-Man … That you can’t really hate The Lizard. That when Peter argues with a policeman about Spidey’s good intentions, the captain points out that the wall-crawler seems not to be fighting for the greater good but to exact a personal vendetta on someone (which is true at that point because until then, Spidey had been pinning down one local criminal after another, not to rid the city of crime but in an effort to track down a man who murdered one of his own).

In fact, this film has more poignance and humor than action (when Peter first gets into costume he transforms into a truly funny guy). I loved the emotion, but some more action would have been nice, especially because when stunts do enter the picture, they are thrilling; and while most of the film may leave 3D-haters asking “why”, I found the third dimension lent an edge to the film’s few action sequences. On the other hand, the special effects are world class no doubt, but The Lizard is not particularly spectacular and there’s one shot of a burning car hanging from a bridge that is terribly obvious in its CG-ness, which is unforgivable for such a big-budget film.

Now to Irrfan: his small role offers little scope for acting, but since his Dr Rathi provides part of the set up for a sequel, he’ll hopefully have a meaty part in Part 2. That disappointment notwithstanding, the beautiful Mr Garfield is surrounded by other wonderful co-stars. Martin Sheen and Sally Field are as charismatic as ever. And Emma Stone is just plain hot! In fact, I’d choose this film’s lead couple any day over Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst from the earlier series! Surprisingly though, despite the sparks between the actors, Peter and Gwen in The Amazing Spider-Man don’t get that one stand-out, memorable scene of aching chemistry to rival Spider-Man 1’s scene in which Mary Jane lifts Spidey’s mask just enough to kiss his lips while he hangs upside down in the rain. Guess that’s yet another reason to look forward to The Amazing Spider-Man Part 2. Seriously, this lovely film deserves a sequel!

PS: DO NOT leave the theatre as soon as the credits start rolling.

Rating (out of five): ***1/2

Release date in the US:
July 3, 2012                   
MPAA Rating (US):
PG-13 (for sequences of action and violence)
CBFC Rating (India):
U/A  
Running time:
136 minutes
Language:
English