Showing posts with label Charles Dickens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Dickens. Show all posts

Friday, February 12, 2016

REVIEW 370: FITOOR


Release date:
February 12, 2016
Director:
Abhishek Kapoor
Cast:





Language:
Tabu, Katrina Kaif, Aditya Roy Kapur, Mohammed Abrar Sheikh, Tunisha Sharma, Aditi Rao Hydari, Rahul Bhat, Lara Dutta, Akshay Oberoi, Cameo: Ajay Devgn
Hindi


Abhishek Kapoor set himself a tough task when he decided to adapt Great Expectations for a Hindi film. His chosen text is the most challenging of Charles Dickens’ classics: it is dreary, gloomy and depressing despite the final crumb offered in the form of a happy ending.

The original is the story of the wealthy Miss Havisham who is so shattered when her groom does not turn up for their wedding, that from that day forward she remains dressed in her bridal finery, keeps her home decorated as it was for the celebrations and lets her wedding cake lie rotting on her dining table. She gives vent to her bitterness towards her cheating lover by training her foster child, an orphan called Estella, to break the hearts of men. Pip – the hero and an orphan himself – is smitten from the moment he meets the little girl. The book travels with them into their adulthood, which is marred by the manner in which old Miss Havisham has affected the young woman’s ability to love.

Abhishek – who earlier made the lovely Rock On!! (2008) and Kai Po Che (2013) – transposes Dickens’ saga from 19th century England to present-day Kashmir. Miss Havisham becomes the handsome Begum Hazrat (Tabu), reclusive resident of the lavish haveli Anjuman; Estella is her daughter Firdaus Jaan Naqvi (Katrina Kaif), who is sent off to study in England – a mandatory move in most of Ms Kaif’s films, designed to explain her accent; and Pip is Noor Nizami (Aditya Roy Kapur), brother of a poor local handyman’s wife, who grows up to become a famous artist.

Though faithful to the book, Fitoor is a not a carbon copy. Thankfully not, since Miss Havisham is Dickens’ most troubling female character, epitomising the ‘neurotic, frustrated, eccentric spinster’ stereotype or that oft-visited cliché of the evil, destructive witch in European fairytales perpetuated through generations of misogyny by artists and society as a whole. This film avoids the lure of the striking, haunting imagery Dickens used to represent her. There is no worm-eaten cake lying in a cobweb-ridden hall in Abhishek’s version, no ugly old lady in a decaying gown, and the mansion is far from decrepit. Quite to the contrary, Anjuman is still rich and beautiful, and the child Noor is smitten from the day he first sets foot in it when his brother-in-law is summoned to do some odd jobs at the house. 

He is as enchanted by Firdaus, the cold, distant, well-turned-out girl-woman who rides a horse on those sprawling grounds and mocks him for his poverty. She is, to him, the unreachable star, an enigmatic creature whose allure lies as much in her aloofness and snobbery as it does in the hand of friendship she condescendingly extends towards him at one point. She moves away. They grow up. They meet again. He is now a grown man in love.

If you can tolerate the extreme sexism in Dickens’ portrayal of Miss Havisham, Great Expectations is actually an ideal choice for contemporary Kashmir. In Fitoor, the Noor-Firdaus love story is not just about gender relations or social disparities. Hazrat does have a reason to hate men, which is revealed much later in the film, and Firdaus at one point does refuse to hook up with Noor, harshly telling him, “Shaadi do darjon ke beech hoti hai (A marriage can only take place between two people of the same class),” but Abhishek and Supratik Sen’s writing takes it beyond that.

In their vision, Hazrat is a metaphor for an older generation in Kashmir, justifiably embittered by the actions of the state but unjustifiably plotting to bequeath that bitterness to their children, denying them their own pursuit of happiness, going so far as to encourage them to sleep with the enemy in their quest for revenge against the Indian state. Yet the state is not a homogeneous entity. It is not just scheming members of government. It is also made up of people, soft, gentle, in love and longing to be loved.

The new generation is, of course, represented by Firdaus; the heterogeneous state, both by the man who jilted Hazrat (played by Akshay Oberoi) and sweet, sweet Noor.

So far so good, except that Abhishek and Supratik appear not to have trusted viewers to get the point without being spoon-fed. Their interpretation is robbed of much of its depth by their needless decision to bestow dark red hair – not a natural Kashmiri colour – on Hazrat and Firdaus. Come to think of it, it’s silly. The interplay of their dyed tresses and auburn, autumnal Chinar leaves – an eternal symbol of Kashmir – is so literal that it makes me want to shake a fist at Team Fitoor in exasperation. C’mon, we got it! You should have trusted us.

This might have been forgivable if it weren’t for the casting of Firdaus. Katrina is woefully inadequate in Fitoor, trying to convey Firdaus’ sorrow and confusion with expressionlessness. To make matters worse, her screen companion through much of the film is an actress who has the ability to eke out feelings from a log of wood. This is not Tabu’s best, but in a role that could have been easily over-played and caricatured, she elicits some degree of empathy even for her decidedly unlikeable character. Aditya as Noor is efficient, but that’s about it.

It is hard to comment on the supporting cast since they are all playing very limited characters. The only exception is the adorable Kashmiri child actor Mohammed Abrar Sheikh who, as little Noor, fits perfectly into the setting. This is not to endorse the belief some film buffs hold that only Kashmiris should play Kashmiris and so on (this subject demands a long discussion for which we do not have space here), but it shows a casualness towards detail when the child playing Noor has a precise Kashmiri accent but Aditya speaks differently.

The film’s technical embellishments are all in place. Anay Goswamy’s visuals are impressive without being overwhelming, the costumes are attractive, and the music by Amit Trivedi (songs) and Hitesh Sonik (background score) is adequate within the context of the film.

Tabu’s makeup artist deserves kudos for lending age to her face intelligently, rather than with standard Bollywood crutches such as thick spectacles and white hair on unchanged skin.

The production design is well thought out, travelling from Anjuman’s wintry insides to the fiery warmth of the spaces Noor occupies in Delhi and London, as he swings between hope and despair. His striking art works and the scenes in which he creates them are among Fitoor’s high points.

The dialogues are inconsistent though. While many are lyrical, there are weirdly suggestive undertones (clearly unintentional) in a reformed terrorist, once helped by little Noor, telling the now-grown-up chap: “The memory of the phiran you gave me has kept me warm through many nights.” Err, didn’t the filmmaker replay that line to himself before retaining it in the film?

This, however, is a mere aside. Fitoor’s primary problem is that it fails to conjure up the sort of passion that it should have and could have with less literalness and better central casting. Perhaps we have been spoilt by Vishal Bhardwaj’s brilliant Haider (2014), another Hindi adaptation of an English literary classic transported to Kashmir. Fitoor certainly can’t be accused of the laziness with which Wazir recently scraped the surface of the state’s agonising reality, but it also lacks the wealth of meaning and emotional resonance of Haider.

There is a bomb blast in the film at a crucial point – the build-up to it is so underplayed that the explosion comes as an absolute shock. It is one of Fitoor’s most memorable, most effective moments, yet the occurrence fails to inform the later actions of those personally affected by it. Therein lies Fitoor’s defining flaw: it is inconsistent in dealing with the political context of its chosen geographical setting.

The pain, the rejection, the searing desire for revenge, the all-conquering power of love – none of it is adequately conveyed in this film which, by the time its final scene rolled around, left me as cold and detached as Estella’s heart was when she first met Pip.  

Rating (out of five stars): **1/2

CBFC Rating (India):

U
Running time:
131 minutes

This review has also been published on Firstpost:


Anna MM Vetticad,Anna Vetticad,Indian cinema,Bollywood,Hindi cinema,Fitoor,Abhishek Kapoor,Tabu,Katrina Kaif,Aditya Roy Kapur,Aditi Rao Hydari,Lara Dutta,Ajay Devgn,Charles Dickens,Great Expectations

Sunday, March 16, 2014

FILM FATALE: SPINSTERS IN POPULAR CULTURE / COLUMN PUBLISHED IN THE HINDU BUSINESSLINE

Headline: SPINSTER OVER SHRIMATI
Introline: Queen’s atypical happily-ever-after is a refreshing change in a sea of gender clichés
Bachelorette, bachelorina, bachelor girl, singleton, single woman…in a bid to avoid the dreaded ‘spinster’, English language users opt for a string of alternative expressions to denote an unmarried female human. Their concerns are easily explained. After all, social prejudice has lent meanings to that word, going way beyond a woman’s marital status. Unlike the coolth associated with the male ‘bachelor’, over the centuries, ‘spinster’ has come to stand for a neurotic, frustrated, ill-tempered, despairing, unattractive woman, unhappy at being unmarried past what is prescribed by consensus as the socially permissible age.
By dodging the word, liberals are possibly succumbing to the very biases they no doubt decry. That’s a subject for another discussion. For the moment though, let’s turn our attention to how mainstream Bollywood keeps away from spinsters as doggedly as well-meaning English speakers do. Single women in Bollywood tend to be 20-somethings who are in the process of being courted, falling in love or getting married to men during the course of their films. Rare is the Bollywood story that dwells at length on a heroine’s singledom and celebrates it, or gives us a leading lady — young or old — who has pointedly opted to stay unmarried. It’s in this scenario that director Vikas Bahl’s Queen, now in theatres, springs a surprise on us.
Queen’s atypical happily-ever-after brings us a Rani Mehra (Kangna Ranaut) who is persistently single and pleased about it. This is a departure from the Hindi film norm of a woman’s position as the heroine being established in terms of her romantic relationship with the hero. Though there are exceptions such as Vidya Balan, Deepika Padukone and Priyanka Chopra (when she chooses well), the filmography of their contemporary Katrina Kaif typifies the Hindi film heroine’s job: to be a pretty showpiece the hero falls in love with, like Kat’s Aaliya was in Dhoom 3 last year.
Bollywood would argue that its sexism merely reflects real life where a woman’s identity is expected to revolve around whether or not she’s a wife; where a man is always the neutral ‘Mr’ revealing nothing to strangers about his marital status, whereas most Indians continue to prefix women’s names with ‘Mrs’ (married) or ‘Miss’ (unmarried) although ‘Ms’ (marital status unspecified) is also available. Queen’s Rani doesn’t want to be someone’s Shrimati for social redemption. She has the confidence to be a spinster — and yes, I insist on using that word.
The arrival of Rani in Bollywood is a welcome baby step for an industry that still insists on pigeonholing men and women. For instance, the carefree bachelor played by Saif Ali Khan in film after film (Hum Tum, Salaam Namaste, Love Aaj Kal, Cocktail) has no spinster equivalent. Cinema and language respond to social diktats. And so, Hum Tums Karan and Cocktail’s Gautam would be widely described as a “ladies’ man” with no pejorative intent. If Karan had a female clone, what would she be though? ‘Gentlemen’s woman’ (a non-existent term) or ‘slut’?
My way: Kangna Ranaut as Rani
Mehra in Queen (top) jives to her own
 tune unlike Deepika Padukone as
Veronica (above, centre) in Cocktail 
who, sadly, turns rather
desperate
Cocktail’s heroine Veronica exemplifies this hypocritical attitude. Humour emanating from sexually promiscuous heroes is commonplace in Bollywood. Cocktail was unusual in that it featured a promiscuous leading lady, adopted an equally non-judgmental stance towards her, and made her sex life — like the hero’s — a source of amusement. Post-interval though, the film descended into crowd-pleasing orthodoxy with the happy-go-lucky Veronica getting neurotically desperate for marriage, while the man remains his easygoing self.
Cocktail’s purported liberalism cloaked its deep-seated narrow-mindedness that was mirrored by a less high-profile film in 2011. In Turning 30, Gul Panag’s trite Naina turns frantic when she turns 30, and shreds her dignity as she panics about middle age, male disinterest, menopause (already?), wrinkles and drooping breasts.
To be fair, Bollywood is not alone in steering clear of spinsters or stereotyping them. Popular culture in the West often reflects similar sentiments even while pretending to do otherwise. British writer Helen Fielding’s bestselling Bridget Jones’s Diary and its film adaptation starring Renee Zellweger were widely lauded for their supposedly free-thinking portrayal of a single woman, yet Bridget was literally obsessed with three primary goals: getting a boyfriend, getting a date, getting laid.
Hollywood superstar Sandra Bullock has a track record of playing stereotypical spinsters (Miss Congeniality, Two Weeks Notice, The Proposal). Being career-oriented for her characters inevitably translates into being testy, gauche and — in the case of Two Weeks Notice — miserably eating pizzas at home alone.
Oceans away in Bollywood, Queen turns up its regal nose at that cliché. With the industry now planning to make Charles Dickens’ novel Great Expectations into a film starring Katrina and Aditya Roy Kapur, it would be interesting to see if Dickens’ Miss Havisham is updated for a modern telling or she is retained as she was in this 19th century classic: a tragic spinster who gave up on life simply because a man jilted her. C’mon Bollywood, prove that you’ve evolved beyond England of 150 years ago and Cocktail in 2012. Here’s your chance to prove that you don’t equate unmarried women with cobwebs and gloom.
 (The writer is the author of The Adventures of an Intrepid Film Critic. Follow Anna M.M. Vetticad on Twitter @annavetticad)
(Note: This column was first published in The Hindu Businessline’s BL Ink supplement on March 15, 2014)
Photographs courtesy:
(1) Everymedia PR (Queen)