Saturday, March 23, 2013

177: AATMA


Release date:
March 22, 2013
Director:
Suparn Verma
Cast:



Language:

Bipasha Basu, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Doyel Dhawan, Shernaz Patel, Mohan Kapur, Tilottama Shome, Darshan Jariwala, Jaideep Ahlawat
Hindi

A woman divorces her physically abusive husband. The man dies shortly afterwards, returning as a spirit to haunt his wife and reclaim their child. That, in a nutshell, is the story of Aatma. Writer-director Suparn Verma’s film begins with the promise of a layered and poignant tale of domestic violence, a self-respecting woman who brooks no abuse and the things human beings do when relationships sour. This is the direction the film takes in the first half, while steering clear of most Bollywood ghost story clichés. Yes, the background score is actually not screechy, there’s barely any blood, and no one, but no one, flies in the air.

Sadly, predictability sets in in the second half. After a while you can tell from a mile who the spook will target next. By the time the climax (or rather, anti-climax) comes around, it’s clear the screenplay has failed to move beyond the potential of the original concept. As things stand, there are elements worth strongly recommending in Aatma, but they simply do not all add up.

Element No. 1: Bipasha Basu is in fine form here as Maya Verma, a woman who takes a broken marriage in her stride but begins to unravel at the prospect of the loss of her child. It’s also a pleasant change to see Bipasha in a film that presents her as a natural beauty with minimal makeup and without the aid of killer gowns or bikinis, just as any great-looking female professional might be. Doyel Dhawan is charming as little Niya and impresses with her acting skills, especially in the scene in which she sees her father’s true colours.

However, it’s a crime to cast Nawazuddin Siddiqui in a film and then give him the most poorly written part of the lot. Siddiqui plays Maya’s dead husband Abhay. What were this man’s motivations? What prompted those fits of rage and the depth of hatred for his wife? We never get to know. Still, we do get glimpses of Siddiqui’s phenomenal talent in a spooky scene involving a bathroom and a schoolteacher, and elsewhere, in the only scene that gives him the canvas he deserves, when the judge awards custody of Niya to Maya causing Abhay to explode with rage. Another actor who gets shortchanged by the writing is the wonderful Jaideep Ahlawat as a policeman investigating a string of crimes, all of them with links to Niya.

There are several points where it seems like Aatma may head in an interesting direction, but then the writer holds back. There’s a neatly executed scene in which Ahlawat’s policeman has a dream which seems to suggest that he’s getting far more involved in the case than he should be. Where did that come from? What happens thereafter? No answers. Elsewhere, Maya is told that the only way Abhay will manage to take Niya away from her is if a wedge is driven between her and the child. Why is that not carried forward? Again, no answers.

Where you can’t fault Aatma is in the departments of cinematography and production design which lend an unrelentingly eerie atmosphere to the film even when the story goes downhill. Sophie Winqvist’s camera seems to stand beside the ghost at some points observing his prey, and sometimes next to us observing them all. Sometimes it goes to floor level watching a woman walk to her death, sometimes it peers down from the balcony of a high-rise building, sometimes it watches the backs of the characters through most of a scene, sometimes it is far, sometimes it is close, and always always it’s lovely. Production designer Sukant Panigrahy complements Winqvist’s work with colours and disturbing settings that seem born to host a ghost.

The effect is particularly striking in Aatma’s two most frightening and most well-conceived scenes: one involving that aforementioned bathroom and schoolteacher, the other featuring a Hindu priest. There are other scarey moments in the film, but since they’re mostly concentrated in the first half, the impact peters out post-interval.  

In the end, Aatma simply leaves you with a sense of what might have been. It might have been that much-needed Bollywood film about spousal abuse and the challenges an assertive woman faces in today’s world; it might have been the story of what loneliness and loss can do to a little child; it might have been about the pain that divorce visits on a child and the politics an evil parent can play; it might have taken us into the mind of a violent husband. The ghost could have been a metaphor here for the horrors in an ailing marriage. The supernatural angle could have been just a clever device to tell a larger story about relationships, the way Reema Kagti’s recent Talaash used the genre to show us a marriage torn apart by the trauma of the death of a child while simultaneously discussing society’s indifference to those who live on its margins.

Could have been… Might have been… Is not… Despite a good start and some truly alluring individual elements, Aatma disappoints.

Rating (out of five): **1/2

CBFC Rating (India):              A
Running time:                           95 minutes


Photograph courtesy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aatma_(film)     


Friday, March 15, 2013

176: JOLLY LLB

Release date:
March 15, 2013
Director:
Subhash Kapoor
Cast:





Language:

Arshad Warsi, Boman Irani, Amrita Rao, Saurabh Shukla, Mohan Agashe, Mohan Kapoor, Vibha Chhibber, Sanjai Mishra, Manoj Pahwa, Harsh Chhaya, Ramesh Deo
Hindi

Jolly LLB is no Munnabhai MBBS.

No seriously, it’s not! It’s surprising how many people have assumed that Jolly LLB is a Munnabhai wannabe, possibly because it contains a degree in the title, stars Munnabhai cast members Arshad Warsi and Boman Irani, and is directed by Subhash Kapoor who has bagged the next Munna project. Well, the commonalities end there. Jolly LLB is neither an out-and-out comedy like the two hugely successful Munnabhai films, nor does it have any pretensions to their scale and gloss. It’s the small, sweet, funny-yet-sad-and-moving, very believable story of struggling lawyer Jagdish Tyagi a.k.a. Jolly (Arshad Warsi) who shifts from Meerut to Delhi in search of greener pastures and greatness. In the Capital, Jolly meets hot-shot lawyer Rajpal (Boman Irani). When Jolly gets involved in the case of a millionaire drunk driver and some dead pavement dwellers, he is pitted against this Goliath of the legal community in one of the country’s most high-profile cases.

Courtroom dramas are rare in Bollywood and when legal proceedings do feature in Hindi films, they tend to be melodramatic and cliched, albeit in a wolf-whistle-worthy way. Jolly LLB is unusual for Bollywood because most of the action takes place in a court complex. And if you’ve ever been to Indian courts, you will agree that the District & Sessions Court in Jolly is far more credible than what we’re used to seeing in Hindi films. There is no speech-making here, except when the lawyers make their closing arguments. The formal language is missing, as is much of the infrastructure. Jolly can barely spell and is clearly not fully acquainted with all aspects of the law. Nor does he get to spout dialogues of the “tareekh pe tareekh” variety from Damini, designed to draw applause and cat calls. Yet when he does make his final address to the judge, it’s hard not to get teary-eyed because it all feels so darned real.

Much of this has to do with the writing and direction by Subhash Kapoor. Unlike his earlier film Phas Gaye Re Obama which petered out in the second half, Kapoor maintains a momentum throughout Jolly LLB. His characters, right down to the ones who barely get to speak, are interesting and memorable. The bigger point being made is about corruption in the Indian judiciary and police, but we’re also given a close look at the desolate conditions in which most lawyers function (in Jolly’s part of the world, even a chamber is a distant dream, and those who aspire to get there must secure their pathetic open-air ‘offices’ – table, chair, metal box – with lock and chain). The many asides in the court scenario in Jolly LLB are utterly, completely delightful (my favourite is the judge who sends off a love SMS just before a hearing begins). The humour is understated and effective (except in one scene where a constable auctions an SHO’s post, which starts out as rather amusing but then feels like it’s trying too hard, unlike the rest of the film). Kapoor is also not afraid to deliver to us a flawed hero whose initial motivation to take up the cause of the pavement dwellers is the potential media attention. What’s equally interesting is that it’s possible, just possible, that Jolly’s motivations remain unchanged even in the end though his methods change.

The always superb Arshad Warsi as Jolly switches between good, bad and gray, naïve and dogged with the consummate ease that only an actor of his calibre can achieve. Amrita Rao as his quietly firm and morally upright girlfriend Sandhya, and Boman Irani as the pompous, ruthless Rajpal are both equally remarkable in their roles. Other wonderful talents pop up to play cameos (including Marathi & Hindi veteran Ramesh Deo). But the highlight of the entire film is Saurabh Shukla’s Judge Tripathi … For too long has this actor been saddled with the same old gangster or cop roles where his physicality predominated his performances. Here in Jolly LLB he’s a slimy, smarmy chap yet it’s hard not to be drawn to this man of dubious integrity even when he farts and openly asks for a bribe and runs his courtroom like a personal fiefdom. Brilliant, Your Honour! Just brilliant!

There’s so much to praise in Jolly LLB that it feels bad to draw attention to the film’s failings which are, unfortunately, too major to be wished away. Warsi – wonderful actor though he is – seems to be playing a character about 20 years younger than his real-life age: can’t understand why some minor tweaking of the screenplay couldn’t have ironed out this problem. Ah well, this is such a common issue with Bollywood films that old habits could close our eyes to it. How, though, can we possibly pretend that we didn’t hear the film’s music? It’s bad enough that composer Krsna has churned out such mediocre melodies for Jolly LLB; what’s worse is that the songs pop up at the most inopportune moments, none more so than the David-versus-Goliath gung-ho number right at the end that almost kills the poignant mood the final courtroom scene leaves us with. If I’d been warned, I would have walked out the second the end credits started rolling. Still, Subhash Kapoor deserves to get off with a light sentence for those grouses … because in the overall analysis, Jolly LLB is a simple-though-layered, loveable film.

Rating (out of five): ***1/2

CBFC Rating (India):
U/A
Running time:
131 minutes

Photograph courtesy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jolly_LLB     

175: SAARE JAHAAN SE MEHNGA

Release date:
March 8, 2013
Director:
Anshul Sharma
Cast:



Language:

Sanjai Mishra, Pragati Pandey, Vishwa Mohan Bhadola, Zakir Hussain, Ranjan Chhabra, Disha Pandey
Hindi
Endearing concept, nice cast, lead characters that feel so real, the genuine atmosphere of a small town in a film set in a small town … there’s a lot going for Saare Jahaan Se Mehnga. Where the film falters and fizzles out is in its inability to go beyond an enjoyable first half or rise above a unique premise, to be a well-rounded satire. Still, while the going’s good it’s worth a watch.


Saare Jahaan Se Mehnga is set in Sonepat in Haryana, where Puttanpal and his wife struggle to make ends meet in the face of back-breaking inflation. He is a government-employed cattle breeder, she runs a beauty parlour in the house. Both incomes combined are not sufficient to keep the kitchen running in a household that also includes a forever-crabby old father and an unemployed younger brother. Matters take an interesting turn when Puttanpal arrives at an idea to beat inflation: he takes a 3-year interest-free loan under a new government scheme to start a shop, but uses the money instead to hoard much-needed household supplies for 3 years.

So far so good. It’s a joy to see comedian Sanjai Mishra being given a role that, for a change, does not require him to be an over-the-top laugh monger … this is a genuinely talented actor who has been repeating himself in some of his recent films, saddled as he has been with repetitive roles. Pragati Pandey (playing Puttanpal’s wife Noori) is unbelievably believable, and scenes of her with clients at Noori Beauty Parlour are among the best written in the film – hilarious and yet so poignant. The relationship of complete understanding between Puttanpal and Noori is very moving. Writers Rupesh Thapliyal and Vijay Manral are in fine fettle up to this point. Another evocative angle is added to the story in the form of Puttanpal’s father – played convincingly by Vishwa Mohan Bhadola – as the old man who fails to realise the pressure he’s placing on his son with his perennial cribbing. And actor Zakir Hussain as a loan inspector is his usual reliable self.

So why doesn’t the film work all the way? Well, firstly, Puttanpal and Noori may be simple, but they’re not stupid, yet it doesn’t occur to either of them (or any character in the film) to wonder how perishable food items are expected to last for 3 full years. Slight problem, no? Even if you do grant the writers this oversight, it’s hard to accept the lack of depth in the relationship between Gopal and his girlfriend Suman (Disha Pandey) and sadder still, the writers’ inability to come up with new ideas as the film rolls along. So okay, the pre-interval portion is fun and telling, but with nothing fresh coming up post interval it’s hard to swallow the over-dramatised final scene in which Puttanpal delivers a long long lecture about inflation and the film takes the populist stance of actually endorsing corruption among members of the public in response to corruption among the political class and inflation. Wonder how Victor Hugo would have wrapped up this story.

Producers Revel Films had earlier given us 2010’s Phas Gaye Re Obama, a tragi-comic comment on the global recession. That film suffered from the same weakness that plagues Saare Jahaan Se Mehnga: lovely concept, excellent execution at the start but a second half that feels stretched once the novelty wears off. SJSM is skating on even thinner ice. Whoever said “well begun is half done” forgot to add that half done still means another halfway to go, and Saare Jahaan Se Mehnga doesn’t manage that journey. This is a sweet film, but it should have been so much more.

Rating (out of five): **3/4