Release date:
|
October 16, 2015
|
Director:
|
Luv Ranjan
|
Cast:
Language:
|
Kartik
Aaryan, Nushrat Bharucha, Sonalli Sehgall, Ishita Sharma, Omkar Kapoor, Sunny
Nijjar
Hindi
|
If it wasn’t trying to
cash in on the success of the first film, Pyaar
Ka Punchnama 2 could have been called All
Women Are Bitches, All Men Think With
Their Penises.
The template is exactly
the same as PKP1: three young men who
are flatmates and best buddies get romantically involved with women who are
manipulative witches from the word go. The men are unhappy almost from the
start of these relationships but are too stupid to see it (actually, the film
portrays it as innocence and natural goodness, not stupidity). Their lives go
downhill as the women get meaner by the day, until the men finally finally put
them in their place and escape.
So determined is
director Luv Ranjan to stick to the prototype that gave him a sleeper hit in
2011, that he retains four out of the six members of PKP1’s lead cast. The tall strapping curly-haired model Raayo S. Bakhirta
has been replaced with another tall strapping curly-haired model type (Sunny
Nijjar). The song Bandh gaya patta, dekho bann gaya
kutta (The leash has
been tied / Look, he’s become a dog) is also repeated here. And actor Kartik
Aaryan, who delivered a many-minutes-long woman-bashing monologue in Part 1, is
given a similar tirade of a similar length in Part 2 too. This is
unapologetically repetitive and unoriginal fare.
As with PKP1, the women in PKP2 too are all nasty, rotten creatures. If they’re not nagging
and lying, acting spoilt or downright unpleasant, they are cheating on their
boyfriends or mooching off them, and a male character actually explains that the
men still tolerate them because of that one thing they have to offer. Err, will
someone tell him he could get that one thing with no strings attached by paying
for the services of a sex worker? He seems to know nothing of this.
PKP2’s three male
leads are in relationships bereft of a single redeeming feature – no warmth, no
understanding, no friendship, yet they persist in permitting their girlfriends
to treat them like turds. It appears to be this film’s contention that men are
so lacking in self-respect, so foolish and so enslaved by their crotches that
they will swallow insults, infidelity and lack of integrity, just so long as
there is sex at the end of the tunnel.
The film’s unrealistic screenplay
lacks balance, as was the case with PKP1.
It is telling that between these two films, Luv Ranjan went all-out feminist
with Akaash Vani, a film on a subject
that’s anathema to most people: marital rape. While dealing with a women’s rights
issue, he gave us a ton of good guys as a counterpoint to one bad man. He
claimed in a recent interview to The
Indian Express that PKP1 happened
because “I wanted to do a film against
love…I wanted to show how in love the whole concept of relationship can become
troublesome”. How come a film that’s supposedly “against love” turned out to
be against women only?
Tut tut, the director
thinks those who call him a misogynist are too touchy. “Our metropolitan societies have
become hypersensitive and we can’t take a joke,” he says. Oh puhlease, Mr
Ranjan, at least be honest about the fact that these two films are a
transparent bid to cash in on the prevailing misogyny among Hindi cinema’s
male-dominated audience. If that were not the case, what are the chances
that you will make PKP3 with gender
roles swapped, an equal measure of unbridled male-bashing and not even one
halfway decent man anywhere in the picture? For the record, such a concept is equally
contemptible.
Since PKP2 is almost a carbon copy of PKP1, what’s right with it is exactly what was right with the first film: the cast has potential
and the production values are slick. Since the team has rolled out pretty much
the same film again, I’m not bothering to repeat all the points I made in 2011:
do read the review I wrote back then (link).
Here’s an additional
point: women often turn on their own to earn brownie points with men in this patriarchal
world, but guys, in a world where you hold all the aces, can you be so foolish
as to celebrate a film that unwittingly portrays you too so poorly? Do you
agree with PKP2’s contention that
your lives revolve entirely around the demands of your nether regions?
Your call.
Rating
(out of five): 1/2
CBFC Rating (India):
|
U/A
|
Running time:
|
136 minutes
|
Ma'am, is the film that bad that you had to give half a star to it... ( I consider one star as avoidable movie). Or has the movie been too mysogynistic and gender biased to deserve more stars. Genuine query.
ReplyDeleteDear Unknown,
DeleteI don't see the difference between the two options you have given me. Isn't that a bit like asking, "is the film bad or is the story bad?"?
Regards, Anna
Ma'am, is the film that bad that you had to give half a star to it... ( I consider one star as avoidable movie). Or has the movie been too mysogynistic and gender biased to deserve more stars. Genuine query.
ReplyDeleteMa'am, is the film that bad that you had to give half a star to it... ( I consider one star as avoidable movie). Or has the movie been too mysogynistic and gender biased to deserve more stars. Genuine query.
ReplyDelete