Showing posts with label Amole Gupte. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amole Gupte. Show all posts

Friday, August 15, 2014

REVIEW 284: SINGHAM RETURNS

Release date:
August 15, 2014
Director:
Rohit Shetty
Cast:




Language:

Ajay Devgn, Kareena Kapoor Khan, Amole Gupte, Zakir Hussain, Mahesh Manjrekar, Anupam Kher, Dayanand Shetty, Sharat Saxena, Ashwini Kalsekar
Hindi
READ AT YOUR OWN RISK: LONG REVIEW AHEAD, FILLED WITH SPOILERS



Meri zaroorte kam hai, isliye mere zameer mein dum hai.” Remember the hero Bajirao Singham’s signature line in director Rohit Shetty’s blockbuster Singham? Or the villain’s equally memorable, melodramatic trademark utterance, “Sab kuchh karne ka, lekin Jaykanth Shikre ka ego hurt nahin karne ka”? I kept waiting for killer dialoguebaazi like that to pop up in the film’s sequel, Singham Returns, that’s now in theatres. What came instead was Singham telling a group of errant youngsters, “Tumhari zaroorat jail ko nahin, desh ko hai,” and telling us how “tareeka nahin, taakat” is what he needs to vanquish a corrupt Maharashtra politician and a dishonest sadhu. Comparatively thanda, as you can see. Singham in this film also repeats some of the more successful lines from Part 1, such as his iconic Marathi dialogue: “Aata maajhi satakli.

That, in a nutshell, encapsulates this film: it’s fun but it lacks the imagination and the novelty value of its prequel. Singham was the Hindi remake of writer-director Hari’s highly successful Tamil film Singam starring southern Indian screen siren and superstar Suriya. Shetty’s Bollywood version with Ajay Devgn in the lead was a virtual carbon copy of the Tamil original, combining enjoyably unrealistic 1970s/80s-style filmic conversations reminiscent of Amitabh Bachchan’s biggest hits, with equally unrealistic, high-octane, imaginatively choreographed action scenes, at an unrelenting pace. For those who don’t mind the required suspension of disbelief, Singham was a thoroughly entertaining experience. Singham Returns is based on Shetty’s own original story with a screenplay by Yunus Sajawal, dialogues by Farhad-Sajid and action by Shetty himself, Jai Singh Nijjar and Sunil Rodrigues. The decline in quality is a reminder of how much Singham owed the writer/s and action director of the Tamil film.

Singham was the story of a politician avenging his insult at the hands of an honest policeman in a small town on the border of Goa and Maharashtra. In Singham Returns, the Mumbai-based DCP Bajirao Singham is caught in the crosshairs of a coalition government battle between the honest Maharashtra Chief Minister (Mahesh Manjrekar) and his idealistic mentor (Anupam Kher) pitted against the corrupt neta Prabhakar Rao (Zakir Hussain) and a holy man (Amole Gupte) whose sabhas with his devotees are a cover for a black money racket.

There’s enough meat in that basic storyline to sustain Singham Returns’ two hour-plus running time for those in an indulgent mood. What’s lacking is the punch and pizzazz of Singham’s stunts and dialogues with their delightfully unapologetic over-the-top-ness. There are a couple of well-designed shootouts here, one scene in which Bajirao Singham flies out from behind a vehicle in slow motion to shoot down a bunch of bad guys even while his body is still suspended in mid-air, and another in which he coolly jumps over a wall; scenes that had me half-giggling, half-wanting-to-whistle. But there’s just not enough where that came from.

If you found the first film troublesome for its unthinking justification of police atrocities, be warned: this one takes that attitude several notches higher. In Singham Returns’ uni-dimensional world, all police personnel are squeaky clean, encounters are a justifiable method of policing, and unbridled power must be placed in the hands of these great men because, you see, there’s no question of any of these flawless, angelic creatures misusing their powers.

This lack of nuance is nothing but laziness in writing from a man who is capable of more. Yes please, it may be intellectually fashionable to brush aside all Shetty’s work as mindless, but that’s actually not the case. Note how, for instance, with Chennai Express, he got all of north India to watch a film in which about 40 per cent of the dialogues were in Tamil without subtitles. The Marathi dialogues in the Singham series are not as many (there was even some Tulu in the first film), but they’re still enough for the determined lack of subtitles to be noticeable.

Notice too the thread of secularism neatly woven into Singham Returns. During a song filmed at Maqdoom Shah Baba’s dargah – a regular haunt of the Mumbai police force, we are told – Singham wears a Muslim skullcap while at prayer. The significance of that scene cannot be lost on an India debating Narendra Modi’s refusal to wear a skullcap offered by a friendly maulvi although he gladly wears the headgear of all other communities, including the Sikh turban. While filming that scene, wonder if Team Shetty was conscious of Devgn’s known closeness to Modi.

The ever-reliable actor delivers an effective performance as Singham. Kareena Kapoor Khan in the limited role of his gluttonous, drama queen of a girlfriend displays her flair for comedy that has been poorly exploited by Bollywood outside Shetty’s Golmaal series. It’s sad though to see a female star of her stature playing fifth fiddle to a major male star in yet another film. For what it’s worth, Shetty’s directorial hand is evident here in her friendly on-screen equation with the hero, a far cry from the amusing tepidity of their pairing in Prakash Jha’s Satyagraha last year.

Instead of glossing over the 12-year age difference between the stars, the screenplay even has her teasing him about dyeing his hair to hide his age, while he tells her in turn that she “looks like a married woman” even though she is young. Elsewhere, one of his juniors says: “Shaadi kar lijiye saab, aapki umar nikal rahi hai.” The refusal to act with women their age continues, but at least some – though not all – of our 40-plus male stars are acknowledging their age on screen.

Singham Returns is a fine example of the dispensability of women in Bollywood sequels. The hero’s girlfriend Kavya (Kajal Aggarwal) in Singham is casually replaced here by Kareena’s Avni. This is standard practice in Hindi film franchises (read: Hera Pheri, Phir Hera Pheri, Race, Race 2), but it’s disappointing coming from the director who gave us the fiercely feisty Meenamma (Deepika Padukone), equal partner to SRK’s Rahul in Chennai Express last year.

The pick of the supporting cast in this film is Amole Gupte playing the evil Babaji who swills alcohol in shorts and Celtics / Dope Chef T-shirts in the confines of his home. Gupte shows flashes of brilliance in his performance, but the writing of Babaji is not as well-rounded as the characterisation of Jaykanth Shikre in Singham. Dayanand Shetty as Singham’s colleague Daya is an interesting addition to the cast. His role as Daya in the iconic teleserial CID gives Singham Returns one of its best lines. An over-made-up Ashwini Kalsekar is laughable as a TV journalist.

DoP Dudley’s cinematography is eye-catching, giving us sweeping aerial shots of Maharashtra’s bridges and water bodies and capturing Mumbai’s Gateway of India rather beautifully. After a while though, those overhead shots become repetitive. As for the music, the title track playing in the background replete with Sanskrit shlokas and throbbing beats remains as catchy as it was when first used in the 2011 film. However, the original songs composed for this film are dull.

Dullness is excusable, not so the deeply disturbing picturisation of Yo Yo Honey Singh’s Aata maajhi satakli accompanying the end credits. It’s bad enough that television dance contests sexualise children. Ajay, Kareena and the controversial singer-musician dance to the song accompanied by a large troupe of children mimicking Ajay’s body language of fury from the rest of the film. Singham Returns, like its predecessor, is an extremely violent film and Ajay’s “Aata maajhi satakli” dialogue signifies his hot-headedness and penchant for fisticuffs. The gore could be passed off with a caveat for adult viewers, but it is decidedly distasteful to try and sweeten the after-effects of bloodletting with the irritatingly precocious dance moves of little kids.

It’s unlikely that Shetty and his team of writers thought that through. Equally poorly developed is the means of protest used by the police in an extended sequence in the film: they take off their uniform shirts in front of the boss and march down the streets in banians. In a country where the male-dominated mass audience sees actresses primarily as sex objects, in an industry where actresses are primarily used as glamourous asides, it would have been clear to the writers that they couldn’t show women taking off their shirts in the same fashion without drawing leery wolf whistles from sections of the audience and lending a whole different dimension to that scene. What is Singham Returns’ solution? It excludes women completely from the protagonists’ immediate team. Later in the crowd a few policewomen are shown in loose white tees instead of uniform shirts, but the secondariness of the women in the entire protest is unmistakable. This scene is reminiscent of the manner in which girls were erased from the underwear protest in the children’s film Chillar Party. As it is in filmmaking, so it is in other areas of life too. If the presence of women in a scenario throws up challenges, we tend not to look for a solution to the challenge; we exclude women from that scenario instead. Easy, no?

A nip here, a tuck there, a tweak here, a touch there, and this could have been a much better and even a much more entertaining film. Those tweaks and tucks would have required more time invested in writing though, which perhaps was considered unnecessary in a film that could make money merely from resting on the laurels of its prequel. Ah well, as it is now, Singham Returns is good enough for a single watch. Fun but unremarkable and unmemorable, that’s what it is.

Rating (out of five stars): **1/2

CBFC Rating (India):

U/A
Running time:
142 minutes

Photograph courtesy: Effective Communication


Saturday, June 18, 2011

REVIEW 53: BHEJA FRY 2

Release date:
June 17, 2011
Director:
Sagar Ballary
Cast:
Vinay Pathak, Kay Kay Menon, Minissha Lamba, Suresh Menon, Amole Gupte, Aditi Govitrikar


I enjoyed Bheja Fry but I wasn’t in love with it. Those words perfectly encapsulate my feelings towards Bheja Fry 2 too.

Vinay Pathak once again plays Bharat Bhushan, the slowhead from Bheja Fry whose profession as an income-tax official is in sharp contrast to his passion for old Hindi film songs. In Part 2, Bhushan wins a national reality tele-show which earns him Rs 25 lakh in cash and a berth on a luxury cruise. Also on the ship is the TV show’s executive producer Ranjini (Minissha Lamba), and businessman Ajit Talwar (Kay Kay Menon) who has been tipped off that an IT raid is headed his way and that a tax official is on board the ship. Talwar erroneously assumes that Bhushan is the taxman who has been sent to track him. The conspiracies and misunderstandings that follow are what makes up Bheja Fry 2.

It’s a funny film about a silly man; funny in a way that doesn’t insult the viewer’s intelligence or ask us to send our brains on vacation while we watch it. As in Bheja Fry (a remake of the French film Le Diner De Cons), Bhushan continues to be a tuneless music buff who insists on singing at the drop of a hat, not quite realising what an ass he’s making of himself. He also remains a well-meaning, pesky bumblehead whose good intentions are often at cross-purposes with the demands of a situation, leading to comical consequences. If you are a Hindi film music devotee who can quote years, names and lyrics with precision, then you are particularly likely to enjoy this film, like the gentleman seated just ahead of me in the theatre where I watched Bheja Fry 2, who kept completing Bhushan’s verses much to the amusement of his fellow viewers.

The film offers plenty of laughs, though not at an unrelenting pace. I particularly enjoyed Bhushan’s ridiculous English translation of Dard-e-dil, and an unexpected exchange with a gray-haired tycoon who allows alcohol to melt his “I spent most of my early years in America” snobbery to join Bhushan in a duet of Marathi songs. Equally hilarious is the North India-South India rivalry between Bhushan and his fellow IT inspector M.T. Shekharan. Their exchanges are filled with stereotypes, yet manage to steer clear of being offensive.

But in a film that’s filled with tasteful humour, I fail to understand the need for that pointless rape joke that was tossed into a conversation between Talwar and his friends. For the nth time, could Bollywood please note: RAPE IS NOT FUNNY!

Suresh Menon as M.T. Shekharan and Kay Kay Menon playing Talwar are the pick of the cast for me. The impact of Pathak’s performance is diluted to some extent because he has played the loveable simpleton too often in too many films since 2007 when Bheja Fry was released. I could still live with that (I liked him very much in Chalo Dilli earlier this year), but in Bheja Fry 2 there are too many places where I became conscious of the fact that he was acting, and not being just Bharat Bhushan. I must also say I was disappointed when the film arrived at the cameo by Amole Gupte playing an eccentric music buff living alone on a deserted island. Gupte recently played an oily schoolteacher to remarkable effect in his own directorial venture Stanley ka Dabba and was the nasty gangster poking fun at Shahid Kapoor in Kaminey. I’m not sure whether it’s the acting or the jumbled writing that’s to blame here. I just know that Gupte’s Raghu D. Burman in Bheja Fry 2 was too loud, too noisy, too muddled and I just couldn’t figure out what he was all about.

Still, it’s nice to see a light-hearted comic venture from Bollywood in which male infidelity is not the central theme (yawn!), nobody pees or farts to amuse us, and the entire cast doesn’t gather in the final scene to run around in circles like they do in pretty much every Priyadarshan and Anees Bazmee comedy. No, Bheja Fry 2 is simpler, not raucous and with all its flaws, it’s entertaining.

Rating (out of five): **3/4

CBFC Rating:                       U/A without any cuts or beeps. (The Censors wanted a scene removed, but the director changed a dialogue in the scene and got an okay from a review committee.)
Running time:                        127 Minutes
Language:                              Hindi

  

Friday, May 13, 2011

REVIEW 41: STANLEY KA DABBA


Release date:
May 13, 2011
Director:
Amole Gupte 
Cast:
Partho, Amole Gupte, Numaan Sheikh, Abhishek Reddy, Divya Dutta, Divya Jagdale, Rahul Singh



Stanley is as loveable as a child can be. He’s got a sense of humour, he’s bright without being precocious, he fibs without malice when he’s in trouble or when a concerned teacher asks why his face is covered with bruises, and he’d rather fill his empty stomach with litres of water from the cooler than admit to his classmates why he can’t afford to bring a tiffin box to school.


And yet, this student of Class IV in Holy Family High School, Mumbai, earns the wrath of his Hindi teacher. The old man thinks nothing of polishing off food from his colleagues and students at lunch time, but picks on Stanley for not bringing a dabba from home. When the irritated boys gang up and trick him out of a chance to swipe their khana but insist on sharing it with Stanley, this oily gent vents his frustration on Stan. Why would a grown man do this to a child?

Stanley ka Dabba asks precisely the question that should be asked in numerous schools across our country where there are just too many adults who forget to treat children like children. And what better way to ask that question than through a film starring child actors who seem to have forgotten the camera in their midst?

Well, they probably did forget. Because writer-director Amole Gupte did not tell the students of Mumbai’s Holy Family that he was making a film. When he started a year-and-a-half’s workshop with them, even he wasn’t sure what the result would be. So he told the kids: the camera you see is just meant as a reminder that you are part of an acting workshop. The dialogues were improvised, the light was natural, the shooting was done on an unobtrusive Canon EOS 7D still camera. And in the lead role of Stanley he cast a guileless, artless little fellow called Partho who seems like he was born into the part. The result: performances so natural that you’ll come away from the film wondering if it was a film at all. For that, more than anything else, Stanley ka Dabba is worth your time.

What bothers me about this film though is the somewhat simplistic, rose-tinted representation of children. In any regular school anywhere in the world, a child with a bruised face, mysterious family background and no tiffin to share with his classmates, would be the target of school bullies. I’m willing to swallow the fact that in this particular school, in this particular class, more children are favourably inclined towards this particular boy because he is talented and such a ray of sunshine. But we all know that gifted, popular kids attract envy in at least some measure. We also know that not every youngster is gentle with others who are less privileged. Yet neither Stanley’s murky home situation nor his remarkable talents attract any nasty classmates. Not one kid snubs him for not bringing food from home. And all the children are uniformly good. I’m afraid that doesn’t seem plausible, especially in a film that otherwise feels so realistic and real.

As I watched Stanley ka Dabba, it seemed to me that in a bid to show us the innocence and goodness in children, and their bonding when faced with an inconsiderate adult, Amole Gupte had completely wished away the real world where loving, thoughtful, sensitive kids co-exist with so many who are not; where bullies and peer pressure are as much a reality as child-like kindness. At the risk of being slaughtered by Taare Zameen Par acolytes, I must point out that this I-must-prove-my-point-at-any-cost approach is the one problem I had with TZP too. Gupte was the writer and creative director of that film, and was originally meant to direct it till Aamir Khan took over the job. In TZP, in order to convince us about the failure of adults to notice the struggles of that unhappy dyslexic boy, the film portrayed EVERY SINGLE ADULT ever encountered by Darsheel Safary’s Ishaan Awasthi as either cruel or competitive or at best, indifferent, UNTIL a major Bollywood superstar turned up as his salvation. Not as bothersome, yet worth mentioning here is the fact that towards the end of Stanley ka Dabba, the film seems to be deliberately stretching itself, almost as if trying to build up a thriller-like suspense over the truth about Stanley’s background. Completely unnecessary since the charm of the film until then is the easy, unforced storytelling style.

But still, my reservations about Stanley ka Dabba don’t take away from the fact that it’s a major  step forward in an otherwise dreary children’s film scenario in Bollywood. 2011 has been a relatively good year for children in Hindi films. Disney’s Zokkomon may have been too juvenile for its own good, but it was still a pleasant reminder that Darsheel Safary is a talent to reckon with. Before that, Bheja Fry director Sagar Ballary served us Kaccha Limboo that was filled with achingly natural performances. And now comes Stanley, a beautiful little boy who will, I suspect, touch your hearts like he did mine despite the incompleteness of his story.

Gupte’s revolutionary approach to making a film with children should make our exploitative, un-vigilant system sit up and take notice: he says he conducted his workshop every Saturday, in four-hour sessions in the morning with two recesses; that the children didn’t miss a single day of school for the film. Clearly, he’s also brilliant in the art of just letting children be. The adult actors are perfect for their parts: Gupte himself as the callous teacher, Divya Dutta as the compassionate one that Stanley has a crush on, Divya Jagdale as the unimaginative science Miss, Rahul Singh who looks distractingly handsome as the kind principal in the priestly black cassock ... As for the child actors: Numaan Sheikh and Abhishek Reddy, you are utterly lovely! All the kids who I am not naming in this review, yes every single one of you: you are lovely too!

And what do I say about Gupte’s son, 10-year-old Partho’s screen presence? Watch out Ranveer Singh! Eight years from now, this guy could well be your competition!

Rating (out of five): ***

CBFC Rating:                       U without cuts
Running time:                       92 Minutes
Language:                             Hindi and English