Showing posts with label FALTU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FALTU. Show all posts

Saturday, March 29, 2014

REVIEW 251: YOUNGISTAAN

Release date:
March 28, 2014
Director:
Syed Ahmad Afzal
Cast:




Language:

Jackky Bhagnani, Neha Sharma, Farooque Shaikh, Prakash Belawadi, Mita Vashisht, Kayoze Irani, Boman Irani
Hindi

The core concept of Youngistaan is highly believable considering India’s political culture and the current scenario. After all, the story of a carefree young Indian techie in Tokyo, compelled by circumstances to succeed his dad as India’s Prime Minister, has resonance in the subcontinent where dynasties are a political staple. Jackky Bhagnani plays the man in question, Abhimanyu Kaul, whose life turns upside down when his dying father (Boman Irani) asks him to take over his job. With their party expecting a defeat in the coming election, the newbie finds his seniors happy to prop him up as their boss since they know they’ll need a scapegoat for the rout. As it turns out, the novice is not the nincompoop they were expecting him to be, he has some clever tricks up his sleeve in addition to his primary weapons: basic decency, honesty, straightforwardness with the public, and his father’s advice.

Sharp concepts unfortunately don’t always translate into great films. Youngistaan slips up at the word go with its casting. Jackky is clearly an earnest, well-meaning boy, but although he has become comfortable enough before the camera to pull off films like F.a.l.t.u. and Rangrezz with an ensemble of leads, he simply does not have what it takes yet to fill out a solo lead role, especially that of a charismatic youth leader pulling a fast one on political veterans.

Watching him at work, I found myself wondering what this film might have been if he’d been replaced by Neil Bhoopalam who recently played a similar role in Anil Kapoor’s 24. Jackky’s problems are compounded by the fact that he is surrounded here by heavyweights who shine despite getting far less screen time. That includes the late Farooque Shaikh doing a wonderful job as his father’s PA Akbar Uncle, Karnataka theatre’s Prakash Belawadi as his slimy bête noir and Brijendra Kala in a teeny appearance as a kulfi seller. Neha Sharma as Abhi’s girlfriend is not bad either, when she’s given something to do beyond being cutesy and young.

The screenplay makes some entertaining allusions to the Congress party, which Pranab Mukherjee and P. Chidambaram are unlikely to find amusing in the unlikely event that they watch Youngistaan. Belawadi plays a corrupt, mundu-clad southern Indian Union Minister who gets outsmarted by the initially reluctant youth leader. Also in the picture is an elderly Bengali politico who Abhimanyu kicks upstairs to the post of President of India. So there is some fun to be had playing spot-the-real-life-neta among those around Abhi; and if they are meant to be who we guess they are meant to be, then Rahul Gandhi should be very flattered by this film.

Some of Abhi’s trump cards are not bad at the idea level either, but the writing needed more sophistication to make their execution sound more credible. The film throws up some thought-provoking questions about privacy and how public life can force certain choices on you. On the other hand, it forgets that the Indian media – notwithstanding all its flaws – tends to stay away from the personal lives of politicians, rarely letting go of its don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy. The writer seems unaware that a number of high-profile politicians in this country are in live-in relationships that the media has not reported, so the screenplay should have given us a strong reason why our journalists would change this long-standing practice only for Abhimanyu Kaul.

In fact, in a bid to introduce serious issues into the discussion, Youngistaan unthinkingly transposes Western realities on to the Indian scenario. Paparazzi in the West may fly choppers over private villas to photograph a princess sunbathing topless, they perch themselves in trees to get a shot of a disgraced star peeping out of his window, they chase Diana and Dodi through a tunnel in Paris…but even the worst, most intrusive Indian news photographers haven’t done one-tenth of that. So again: why would the Indian media change only for Abhimanyu Kaul?

It’s also inexcusable that the Indian PM is shown declaring loudly in a speech at the UN that Hindi is India’s national language. Err, some rudimentary research would have taught the writers that India does not have an officially recognised national language.

The direction is as patchy as the writing. On the one hand, debutant Syed Ahmad Afzal seems assured in his handling of the scenes where Abhimanyu’s personal and professional lives intersect, often to comical effect, or where he is taking on his party’s bigwigs. Yet in too many places a juvenile effort is made to inject profundities into the proceedings. Most in-your-face of them all is a shot of Abhi walking down a hospital corridor after his father’s death and in the opposite direction comes a nurse carrying an infant in her arms. The old order changeth yielding place to the new…yeah yeah, we get that, but please make the point more subtly than a Class V student might have done. And for heaven’s sake, if you want to be taken seriously, don’t ask your leads to pose around in typical Bollywood style at the Taj Mahal.

In the overall assessment, it's only fair to point out that this is a film with many interesting elements: the resemblance to real-life incidents and individuals, some unexpected twists and turns, the dilemma of a girlfriend who is not keen on marriage but is suddenly thrust into a situation where not marrying the man she loves could harm his career. The songs too are nice, Suno na sangemarmar ki ye minarein is especially so. Despite all this going for it, Youngistaan still ends up feeling flat and dull for three reasons: inconsistent writing, inconsistent direction and a weak lead actor.

Rating (out of five): *1/2 (stars out of 5)

CBFC Rating (India):
U/A
Running time:
133 minutes

Photograph courtesy: Everymedia Technologies


Saturday, March 23, 2013

REVIEW 178: RANGREZZ


Release date:
March 21, 2013
Director:
Priyadarshan
Cast:



Language:

Jackky Bhagnani, Amitosh Nagpal, Vijay Verma, Priya Anand, Raghav Chanana, Akshara Gowda, Rajpal Yadav, Pankaj Tripathi, Lushin Dubey
Hindi

I have to confess I enjoyed watching Rangrezz for the most part. Sometimes though, the message a film sends out in the final few minutes can be so offensive, so disturbing and so objectionable that all the good direction, slick action and beautiful music that came before is simply dwarfed.

Rangrezz is the story of three friends who decide to help a fourth friend elope with his lover since her father is dead against the relationship. Rishi (Jackky Bhagnani), Pakiya (Vijay Verma) and Vinu (Amitosh Nagpal) risk life, limb and family to bring Joy (Raghav Chanana) and Jasmine (Akshara Gowda) together in one of the most brilliantly executed, breath-stopping action sequences I’ve ever seen in a Hindi film. The introduction to all the characters is reasonable fun (even if it’s amusing to see two songs stuffed into the proceedings to blatantly provide the producer’s son Jackky with a platform for his dancing skills); the several-minutes-long elopement sequence dramatically turns the tone of the film; there’s a completely unexpected and intriguing twist in the tale in the second half (unexpected if you’ve not seen the original Tamil film Naadodigal on which Rangrezz is based); and then come the two speeches in the last half hour that could have been dubbed laughable if they weren’t dangerous, considering our Indian social reality.

You see, the entire point of Rangrezz is to preach to us that pig-headed parents are completely justified in preventing children from choosing their own life partners because, well, young people are too irresponsible, hormonally driven and sexually obsessed to be taken seriously in such matters. This lesson delivered to us by Jackky’s Rishi is completely at odds with the support he lends to his own sister and her boyfriend … but let not logic come in the way of a solid Bollywood bhaashan.

The sermonising drivel doled out in the end spoils the impact of what is otherwise a rather entertaining film. Jackky may lack screen presence but it’s only fair to say that his acting has been steadily improving since he made his debut with Kal Kissne Dekha four years back. Besides, Bhagnani Senior has had the good sense here not to saddle his son with a solo hero film as he did with KKD and last year’s Ajab Gazabb Love. In Rangrezz, as with 2011’s Faltu, Jackky shares screen space with a bunch of talented co-stars (barring Rajpal Yadav who is painfully repetitive and Lushin Dubey who over-acts) and comes off not-too-badly as a consequence. Sure he gets to strip off his shirt to show off his abs within seconds after the start of the film, and yes Vinu and Pakiya are ignored in the film’s song-and-dance sequences, but we shall grant an indulgent daddy this much. All is forgiven since he had the courage to cast the highly talented Chandan Roy Sanyal as Jackky’s buddy in Faltu, and here he gives us the attractive and charismatic Vijay Verma as Rishi’s hot-headed friend Pakiya and the nicely understated Amitosh Nagpal as the more level-headed Vinu.

Full marks to the film’s editor T.S. Suresh for his handling of the elopement sequence and to singer Sukhwinder for his thumping rendition of Shambho Shiv Shambho during that scene. In the midst of all this praise, it must also be said that director Priyadarshan does not know when to stop if he’s got a good thing going – it’s perfectly acceptable to show a person being injured in a gruesome battle, but what purpose is served by then also showing us close-ups of needle and thread being put to a deep gash on a man’s forehead? Thankfully, these gratuitous moments in Rangrezz are not many. Later in the film, Shambho Shiv Shambho is used again and, not surprisingly, is far less effective than the first time – not only because of over-use but because by then we have already been lectured once about justifications for parental despotism. As for the Gangnam Style video in the end featuring Jackky – it’s a poor revision of Psy’s original that is still notching up millions of hits on youtube.

This review would be incomplete without singling out Rangrezz’s cinematographer Santosh Sivan for capturing rural India in a way that Bollywood rarely does. The film is filled with lovely shots of the countryside, epitomised by one particularly mesmerising tree that spreads out like a protective, gigantic umbrella over our protagonists. Neatly tucked into the film right before its shocking moral-science class is also a very nice point being made to parents about how a child’s choice of marital partner should not be based on caste and class. Odd, is it not, that what follows is absolution for parents who oppose their children’s right to pick a husband or wife?

With much to recommend in it despite its flaws, it’s a crying shame that the ultimate message being sent out by Rangrezz makes it an advertisement for extreme conservatism. I can quite imagine khap panchayats paying big money to Priyadarshan to make versions of this film in other languages. A crying shame indeed!

Rating (out of five): **3/4

CBFC Rating (India):
U/A
Running time:
143 minutes

Photograph courtesy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangrezz