Release date:
|
June 28, 2013
|
Director:
|
Raj Kumar Gupta
|
Cast:
Language:
|
Vidya Balan,
Emraan Hashmi, Rajesh Sharma, Namit Das, Parvin Dabas
Hindi
|
Ghanchakkar is a fantastic concept stretched to non-fantastic
proportions. There are so many individual elements in the film that are wonderfully
memorable … the angle at which Vidya Balan’s eccentric Neetu holds her fork at every
single meal … the absolute consistency with which she remains obsessed with
women’s / fashion magazines, come hell or high water … the stroke of genius
that inspired the director to pick three celebrity masks with just the right
expression (one hilariously wide-eyed, the other grave, the third half-smiling)
to be worn by three bank robbers ... Such gems! Yet somewhere along the way in
this tragi-comic thriller, you get the feeling that Team Ghanchakkar (direction: Raj Kumar Gupta, writing: Gupta and Parvez
Sheikh) was so impressed with their concept and climax that they failed to
notice they were meandering and repeating themselves beyond a point.
Ghanchakkar is about a career criminal on the verge of retirement, Sanju
(Emraan Hashmi), who agrees to be a part of one last heist that will set him up
for life. He is roped into this bank robbery by two seemingly bumbling fellows called
Pandit (Rajesh Sharma) and Idris (Namit Das). Sanju is given the task of
keeping the money safe for three months till the police search cools down. And along
comes the twist in the tale. When Pandit and Idris return to claim their share
of the loot, the money can’t be found for reasons I won’t reveal here. Is Sanju
spinning yarns? Or does he have a genuine problem? What role does his wife
Neetu play in this entire affair? The answers are what make up the story of Ghanchakkar.
The film is thoroughly funny to begin with. The bank
robbery is a killer. The dinner scenes with Sanju and Neetu too are a hoot. In
fact, Neetu is a one-woman variety entertainment show who kind of reminds me of
that line Balan’s Reshma a.k.a. Silk uttered in The Dirty Picture, “Filmein sirf teen cheezon ki vajah se chalti hain… entertainment, entertainment, entertainment… aur main entertainment hoon.” Yes she is, people! Balan does
not miss a single beat throughout the film, which is amazing considering how bizarre
her character is and how long the film goes on and on. The way she slouches
over the table during meals, the angle at which she holds her fork that I just
can’t get out of my mind, her garish outfits that she considers “fashionable” aur “ultra-modern”, that Punjabi accent
that her character slips into every time she’s riled though she speaks a
smoother variety of English in her calmer moments ... it’s all delightful. She
claims that her ensembles are all inspired by Femina, Cosmopolitan, Vogue and their ilk. I suspect those
magazines would not be flattered since she, clearly, is mixing and matching and
modifying their suggestions to come up with her own ridiculous wardrobe. And
then there is that scene in which Sanju is in the bathroom and Neetu calls out
to him from their bedroom, “Ab andar hi
rahoge ya baahar bhi aaoge?” We don’t see her at all when she speaks that
sentence, but the come-hither tone just oozes through that wall. This is one of
those performances that can only happen when there is a meeting of minds
between an extremely talented actress, director, writer/s, make-up artist and
costume director. For Neetu above all else, the entire team of Ghanchakkar deserves one big salaam.
Not so elsewhere. Emraan Hashmi is a usually dependable
actor but his Sanju is a tad dull. There’s a nice touch in the writing of his
character though. Sanju lets wifey take the initiative in bed, which is
something we almost never see in Hindi films. He’s also good friends with her;
he may hate her cooking and her clothes, but he certainly respects her and
leans on her for advice.
The ones who suffer the most from the repetitiveness that
sets into the film past the halfway mark are the remarkable talents of Rajesh
Sharma and Namit Das. Sharma is a wonderful actor and has been a companion to Balan and director Raj Kumar Gupta in recent years. Who can forget
his excellent corrupt-yet-honest policeman in No One Killed Jessica (the film that first brought Balan and Gupta
together) or the oily-yet-likeable film producer who gave Silk her big break in
Milan Luthria’s The Dirty Picture? Das
played Ranbir Kapoor’s friend in Wake Up
Sid, though he’s probably most familiar to viewers these days as the boy
who refuses to phone his mother in the Idea ad. Sadly, Pandit and Idris are uni-dimensional
characters who become increasingly uninteresting as the film rolls along.
What is it with so many Hindi film makers that compels
them to make 2-to-3-hour films out of concepts that demand brevity? This is a
criticism that completely contradicts Gupta’s track record so far: the
highlights of his films Aamir and No One Killed Jessica were their
compactness and pace. The problem with Ghanchakkar
is that it needed both, but has neither. And few things can be worse for a film
than stretched jokes.
So after an impressive set-up, there are entertaining bits
and pieces in the second half of the film, and the last couple of minutes of the climax are not bad at all, but it just doesn’t add up. It’s also impossible to get past the fact that the writers clearly ran out of ideas after a point. Three
great masks and a Vidya Balan do not a summer or a movie make.
Rating (out of five): **
CBFC Rating (India):
|
U/A
|
Running time:
|
137 minutes (as per pvrcinemas.com)
|
Writing attractively is a talent ....writing what is in your mind is different... that is your thoughts...but make it readable by public is a difficult one...only a talented writer can do this
ReplyDeleteHappy to hear that my fave reviewer liked Vidya Balan's performance in this film. What a babe! What an actress! Thank you dear Anna
ReplyDeleteAmazing review, Ma'am.
ReplyDeleteur review reminds me of an interview that of yours with Vidya Balan some years ago, after the release of Paa. You had questioned her about a scene in Paa in which she recommends a childless woman suffering from cysts to have a child immediately. You questioned Vidya for giving such a 'regressive' answer. Let me tell you something, if you are a woman suffering from cysts and you go to a gynae, that is exactly what she will tell you. 'Have a baby asap for your hormones to stabilize'. It was a very real life situation that you failed to understand, because perhaps you don't have the misfortune of suffering from cysts. It is always a pleasure to be a woman, as much as you want to deny that you are one and Vidya Balan should be commended for reflecting the reality of Indian womanhood through her characters. As it is said in the Bible: ...my strength is made perfect in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9)
ReplyDeleteDear “Anonymous”,
DeleteInstead of speculating about whether I have cysts and INFORMING ME that I want to deny that I’m a woman, how nice it would have been if you had critiqued the content of my review. Perhaps you don’t realise that you reveal your intellectual inadequacies by making personal remarks. I won’t dignify such comments by countering them, but I must counter the inexplicable factual errors you have posted here regarding my work:
(1) You seem to be under the impression that I’ve criticised Vidya Balan’s performance in Ghanchakkar. Quite to the contrary, my review singles out her performance and her role for praise. Next time, do read a review before commenting.
(2) Not only did you fail to understand that interview I did with Vidya about Paa, you also misquote me. I didn’t call her regressive. I said that I wish the gynaecological issue mentioned in the film had been elaborated upon instead of being mentioned only in passing since there's a lot of social pressure that comes into play over women's decisions about when to have babies; it's an important issue, and a passing mention could be widely misinterpreted by the very people who put such pressure on women, therefore I felt it required greater discussion.
I love constructive and well-informed criticism but you will appreciate why I won’t waste respect or politeness on people who make personal remarks and don’t have the courage to reveal their identities.
Regards,
Anna MM Vetticad