Showing posts with label Rajkumar Santoshi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rajkumar Santoshi. Show all posts

Friday, February 5, 2016

REVIEW 369: GHAYAL ONCE AGAIN

Release date:
February 5, 2016
Director:
Sunny Deol
Cast:






Language:
Sunny Deol, Narendra Jha, Tisca Chopra, Shivam Patil, Aanchal Munjal, Diana Khan, Rishabh Arora, Om Puri, Soha Ali Khan, Manoj Joshi, Nadira Babbar, Abhilash Kumar, Harsh Chhaya, Sachin Khedekar
Hindi

Ghayal Once Again marks the return of Sunny Deol as one of the best-remembered characters he has ever played on screen. Ajay Mehra from 1990’s Ghayal, directed by Rajkumar Santoshi, preceded the signature “dhai kilo ka haath” Sunny held up in court as a lawyer in Santoshi’s Damini (1993). These two films gave the actor the two National Awards of his career and were a source of much viewing pleasure, even to some among us with increasing reservations about flaring nostrils, red eyes and yelling in the midst of flying fists.

The sequel to Ghayal – directed by Sunny himself – seems to be the star’s effort to do a balancing act between an emerging audience with changing tastes and his own traditional following. It works for a considerable part of the film; but after a while it is neither here nor there and it all goes downhill.

The hero himself enters the frame 15 minutes into the proceedings, in a scene that is surprisingly low key in comparison with the many grand entries Sunny has made on screen in the past. When it is hinging itself on action alone, Ghayal 2 is effective, even when you cannot but be aware of the improbability of it all.

Sure there is silliness along the way, plenty of over-the-top action too, but it is nothing that we have not willingly swallowed in the past from Hollywood action adventures such as the MI, Die Hard, Indiana Jones and Bond series, all of which demand a suspension of disbelief from viewers. Admittedly too, there are spots of tackiness elsewhere, especially when the writers are trying too hard to be youthful and cool (such as a completely superfluous song and dance sequence involving the four kids at the centre of this story, or another where they hang out with the grandfather of one of them). Yet, not counting the needlessly extended ending where schmaltz is injected into what should have been some good old-fashioned, absurdly unapologetic dishum-dishum, Ghayal Once Again’s stunt sequences are fun.

In Ghayal, Ajay went on a rampage to execute a treacherous villain (Amrish Puri) for preying on his businessman brother (Raj Babbar). After the events of that film, he spent 14 years in jail and on his return, has been running a corruption-hunting media platform called Satyakam with the support of good-hearted souls he met in prison and a wide underground network of concerned citizens. The pivotal plot point of Ghayal 2 emerges when four students unknowingly shoot a video of a crime being committed by a powerful individual and decide to hand it over to Ajay.

The opening quarter hour of the film, which includes black-and-white flashbacks to the previous one, are deceptively calm. The chases that follow are nail-bitingly suspenseful, even though it makes no sense that not a single soul stops to help the children or Ajay, despite the latter’s evident popularity among the public. Besides, when blood-thirsty goons go on a rampage in a Mumbai mall, how on earth, in this day and age does it come about that not a single eye-witness manages to clandestinely shoot their violence and upload it somewhere?

No doubt police, politicians and a pliant or scared media have in real life colluded to cover up crimes committed by influential individuals. Those though did not happen before the eyes of thousands of witnesses. The initial murder in the film occurs in a private space and is hidden in a believable fashion. That part of the screenplay is convincing. But the effort to abduct the children and to punish Ajay for helping them, are both done so publicly that the silence of the onlookers is ridiculous.

Really? Not one person steps forward? Not even a few seconds of the bloodletting surfaces on Youtube or any other online space? Not even one media house, not even a marginal off-mainstream platform or unknown blogger, has the courage to report these very openly conducted goings-on on the roads, malls and trains of Mumbai? Really?

It is a measure of the effectiveness of the film’s well-paced action choreography that these chase scenes manage to keep even a cynic on edge despite this.

The script’s bigger failing though is that it skims over too many characters without giving them enough flesh. The murderer had particular potential because of his lack of redeeming factors, but we get to know little about him beyond the fact that he is a spoilt brat. Of the quartet who set out to expose him, you may remember Aanchal Munjal as the young artiste who played Kajol and Arjun Rampal’s child in We Are Family (2010). She and Shivam Patil – Anushka and Rohan here – are worth watching out for.

The execution of Ajay’s relationships in Ghayal 2 are too reliant on fan affection for Sunny and nostalgia for the first Ghayal. Sunny’s acting too remains dated, with every emotion over-stated and over-done.

There is, however, another note-worthy dynamic at play here. It is interesting to see an omnipotent industrialist (Narendra Jha, nice) and his wife (Tisca Chopra) torn between their conscience and their natural parental instincts when they recognise the potential for evil in their offspring; a wealthy father’s arrogance tempered by paternal fears; a mother who is shocked at the wrongdoings being committed in her presence yet does not stop them; another (Nadira Babbar) who points out to her son that it is the job of a parent to cover up a child’s mistakes, not his crimes.

This and the film’s well-executed chases are dragged down by its stupid improbabilities, its lack of focus, too many loose ends and oh yes, those bad white extras. When one of them tells Sunny in the end to drop his gun and follows that up with a laboured, “Now we are going to beat you up with our bare hands,” I laughed out loud. It reminded me of cars reversing with twangy, recorded voices warning bystanders, “Attention please, this car is backing up.” What is it with Bollywood producers that they will hire a helicopter for a grand finale but will not spend on above-average Caucasian actors for incidental roles or invest in good writing?

The name of Ajay’s newspaper in this film is no doubt a bow to Dharmendra’s 1969 film Satyakam in which Deol Senior played an idealist struggling against a corrupt world. That classic deserved a better-thought-out tribute than this one.

Rating (out of five stars): **

CBFC Rating (India):

UA
Running time:
126 minutes

This review has also been published on Firstpost:





Friday, January 3, 2014

POLL 6: WHY HASN’T AN SRK-AAMIR-SALMAN-STARRER BEEN MADE YET?


Dear Readers,

Director Rakesh Roshan’s Shah Rukh Khan-Salman Khan-starrer Karan Arjun was one of 1995’s biggest box-office successes. Rajkumar Santoshi’s Andaz Apna Apna with Aamir Khan and Salman the previous year did not make similar money, it earned just a moderate amount, but over the years it has achieved cult status among comedy buffs. Considering that the Khan pairings of the past have each made their mark in different ways, it’s only natural to wonder why no one has yet cast (or managed to cast) Aamir and Shah Rukh together in a film or, better still, got all three of them in a single movie.

In 2014, Salman Khan completes 25 years as a leading man in the Hindi film industry – he started this journey with Maine Pyar Kiya in 1989, following an inconsequential supporting role in Biwi Ho To Aisi. Aamir Khan made his debut as a Bollywood hero in 1988 while Shah Rukh was winning hearts with his small-screen debut Fauji in the same year.

It was in this context that I asked you this poll question in the last week of December 2013:

WHY DO YOU THINK A BOLLYWOOD FILM STARRING SHAH RUKH KHAN, AAMIR KHAN AND SALMAN KHAN TOGETHER AS THE LEADS HAS NOT YET BEEN MADE?

Here’s how you voted:

3.7% of you voted for this reason: Because no Bollywood producer can afford their salaries for a single film

6.1% of you picked: Because even if a Bollywood producer could afford to pay all three Khans their usual salaries, it would be an unviable project, too expensive to recover its cost

2.5% chose: The three Khans don’t want to work together because of professional rivalries

4.9% believe: The three Khans don't want to work together because of personal animosity

26.8% (that’s a majority of you) voted for this reason why you believe an SRK-Aamir-Salman-starrer has not yet been made: No one has as yet written a script that’s worthy of such a casting coup

12.2% selected a reason that I thought would get very few votes (it turns out I have a much higher opinion of the Hindi film industry than you do): Bollywood is incapable of ever writing a script that’s worthy of such a casting coup

1.2% of you voted for a reason I assumed would get 0 votes: The stars’ fans wouldn’t want them to work together

2.5% of this blog’s readers think: Nobody is interested in seeing such a film

18.3% of the votes, that’s the second highest number, went to: The combined effect of their salaries, egos and insecurities would be impossible for any producer or director to handle

0% votes went in favour of: The stars don’t have dates

0% again chose: It’s too risky. What if such a film is started today and they are no longer as major stars by the time it’s completed?

2.5% felt: Bollywood does not have a director who would not be intimidated by their combined presence

18.3% said (and this makes it a tie for the second spot): All the above

1% cast their vote in favour of: None of the above

MY TAKE:

First, I learnt an important lesson in this poll: formulating questions in a poll is not easy. I often get irritated with TV channels and newspapers for asking questions that I’ve felt were designed to manipulate my response to them, yet here I forgot to add a crucial option that I myself would have liked to exercise as a voter: some of the above. I know this not just because some of you told me so, but because I too can’t pick any one of the above options. My answer is a combination of “some of the above”.

Without that option, my vote would have echoed the majority view here: No one has as yet written a script that’s worthy of such a casting coup

I believe a Bollywood film starring Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan and Salman Khan together as the leads has not yet been made because Bollywood has for years lacked the imagination to write a script that would merit such a casting coup. My reasoning goes beyond that though. Certainly there has been more experimentation in the past five years than there was in the formula-ridden 1970s-90s, but unfortunately, the three Khans have grown in stature and box-office clout as the industry’s risk-taking abilities increased. This means the Khans are getting more expensive to hire with every passing year. This means that a script accommodating each of their strengths would require even more imagination now. No doubt Bollywood has talents out there that are capable of writing such a script, but unless such a writer has the support of an adventurous, risk-taking, moneyed producer with the power to persuade the three Khans to look past their personal equations, that script will remain on paper or won’t be written at all. And until Step 1 has been taken, until such a script has been written with the support of such a producer, where is the question of approaching the Khans and figuring out whether they’ll say yes or no?

This is not to say that convincing them will be easy. After all their unprecedented longevity has been at least partly built on a rivalry that has often been bitter. Getting past that would be tough. The challenge would be compounded by the fact that a successful joint project has the potential to benefit their careers jointly, not singly. Why would anyone work so hard to help an arch rival rise in stature? Alternatively, there would be the fear that one of the three would emerge from the project looking better (more talented, more charming, more good-looking) than the others. None of these hurdles would be insurmountable though if that first step was taken.

After all, if Garry Marshall could assemble Julia Roberts, Ashton Kutcher, Anne Hathaway, Jennifer Garner, Jamie Foxx, Bradley Cooper, Patrick Dempsey, Jessica Alba, Jessica Biel, Eric Dane, Hector Elizondo, Queen Latifah, Kathy Bates, George Lopez and Shirley MacLaine with a clutch of young stars including Taylor Swift in Valentine’s Day in 2010; if Steven Soderbergh could manage to get Kate Winslet, Gwyneth Paltrow, Marion Cotillard, Matt Damon, Laurence Fishburne and Jude Law together for Contagion in 2011; then a lot is possible.

In the past, when asked if he could manage the ultimate casting coup for Bollywood, producer-director Karan Johar has laughed off the possibility, once telling a journalist that if he were to make such a film he would end up in hospital. Frankly, despite what he says, if any director could manage such a casting coup, it’s KJo. What he needs first though is the appropriate script backed by one of Bollywood’s big studios (his Dharma Productions is unlikely to be able to financially afford such a film). If ever those two elements – a great script and a rich studio – fall into place, allow me to be an optimist: I do believe the three Khans could be persuaded to star as joint leads in a film.

That’s it on this subject. A new poll is up on the right-hand-side panel of this blog: please vote for your choice of Bollywood’s Best Actor in 2013.

Warm regards and a Happy New Year to all my readers,

Anna

Photographs courtesy: (a) Chennai Express: Disney UTV (b) Dhoom 3: Yash Raj Films (c) Dabangg 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dabangg_2