Showing posts with label Richard Armitage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Armitage. Show all posts

Friday, August 8, 2014

REVIEW 283: INTO THE STORM

Release date (India):
August 8, 2014
Director:
Steven Quale
Cast:




Language:
Richard Armitage, Sarah Wayne Callies, Matt Walsh, Alycia Debnam-Carey, Nathan Kress, Max Deacon, Jerry Sumpter, Arlen Escarpeta, Scott Lawrence
English



Into The Storm is a 90-minute-long unrelenting adrenaline rush. Not much more. Nothing less.

The humans in the film are subordinate to the tornadoes that strike, as is the case with all natural disaster movies. The difference here is that director Steven Quale does not pretend otherwise. Disaster flicks require incredible writing skills to convey genuine involvement in the lives of their characters. Most end up being schmaltzy and/or cliched in the effort. Into The Storm takes an alternative route, which too is not a bad idea: it gives us three primary characters around whom to wrap the twisters, but unlike other films of the genre, it does not for a second claim to be more concerned about them than it is about ensuring that the audience has an awesome special-effects-ridden experience.

And awesome it truly is! Every long shot of towns being uprooted, every medium shot and close-up of those ghastly winds, that Gravity-like uplifting scene in the eye of a storm (“a sight only God has seen”)… awesome is an understatement. You can guess how much fun this film is from the fact that I’ve used that awful word here thrice already, after years of threatening to boycott teenaged friends every time they utter it.

The people in the story are incidental but not insignificant. First up is Garry (Richard Armitage), vice-principal of a high school in the US town of Silverton, which is preparing for the graduation of its senior class. Garry has asked his sons to record on-camera messages from the students passing out, for a time capsule to be opened in 25 years. Trey (Nathan Kress) follows his father’s instructions, while Donnie (Max Deacon) quietly takes off to help his schoolmate and long-time crush Caitlyn (Alycia Debnam-Carey) with an assignment. Then there’s Pete (Matt Walsh), a professional storm chaser travelling around the country with a team, in a tank that can withstand winds up to 170mph, followed by a van that is in effect a meteorological department on the move. Finally, there’s Allison (Sarah Wayne Callies), Pete’s met expert who is missing her little daughter back home.

Into The Storm is a film in the found footage genre. If you’ve seen the Paranormal Activity series (or Dibakar Banerjee’s Love Sex Aur Dhoka and Pavan Kripalani’s Ragini MMS here at home), you know what that means: a film running partly or fully on footage shot by characters in the drama. The idea behind the genre is to conjure up a sense of reality, a feeling that we as viewers have been a part of the filmmaking process along with the person/s – known or unknown – behind the camera. Into The Storm smartly escapes the sometimes-physically-nauseating shakiness of such films though, with the plot cleverly ensuring that the characters operating the equipment are either pros (Pete’s videographers) or accomplished amateurs (Trey and Donnie).

The desire to convey a moral-of-the-story right in the end marginally diminishes Into The Storm. The simplistic nature of the message makes it worse. According to this film, in times of crisis we discover a core of basic human goodness in even the worst people. Perhaps this is true in most cases. Yet it’s naïve to not also acknowledge the existence of pure, unvarnished evil. The healthy youngster who pushes aside an old or pregnant person to escape a stampede is not a fiction. Locals who steal jewellery and cash from corpses at plane crash sites are not a fiction. The truth is that crisis brings out the best in some people and the worst in others.

This brief detour is an unnecessary diversion in a film that otherwise sticks doggedly to being an SFX fiesta. As things stand, it’s a visual spectacle. Brian Tyler’s music stays just right – at no point is it overwhelming. And the lives of Garry, Pete and Allison are given minimalist treatment, which is what makes them so effective. A lesser film might have delivered long-drawn-out back-stories and rounded things off with a mushy Garry-Allison romance; this one chooses to end in an unexpected fashion on that front.

A friend asked as we left the hall: What’s the difference between Into The Storm and Twister (that 1996 film about tornadoes starring Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton)? Answer: this one has less story and has taken advantage of 18 years of advancements in film technology to deliver even better special effects.

Into The Storm will probably become obsolete as soon as a new twister film with next-generation SFX comes around. For the moment though, the effects are breathtaking, the pace is spot-on and the inexorable tension is mind-blowing. If you are looking for emotional depth, you won’t find much of it here. But just as some folk go to watch Fast and Furious films simply to see fast cars, if your tastes lie in that direction then Into The Storm is worth watching simply for the storm. Believe me, it is (here comes that awful word again) awesome.

Rating (out of five): **3/4

CBFC Rating (India):

U/A
Running time:
MPAA Rating (US):
90 minutes
PG-13 (for sequences of intense destruction and peril, and language including some sexual references)
Release date in the US:
August 8, 2014



Saturday, December 15, 2012

165: THE HOBBIT: AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY (3D)

Release date:
December 14, 2012
Director:
Peter Jackson
Cast:

Language:

Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Andy Serkis, Hugo Weaving, Cate Blanchett, Christopher Lee
English

A magnificent spectacle and a cure for insomnia … that’s Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey The film’s overwhelming self-indulgence sadly dilutes the impact of so much that’s so remarkable about it – the grandeur of it all, the breathtaking visuals, writer J.R.R. Tolkien’s imagination, Howard Shore’s rousing music and the lovely cast helmed by Ian McKellen who has more charisma in his little finger than most actors can hope to summon up with their entire personality. Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins the hobbit – a little human-like being – is a likeable fellow; Richard Armitage as the dwarf leader Thorin Oakenshield possesses the most arresting pair of eyes on a striking face; and the wonderful Andy Serkis returns once again to summon up the motion-capture-induced Gollum, that wretched creature who remains my favourite character in the entire Lord of the Rings (LOTR) series. To borrow Gollum’s single-word refrain, it’s all quite “precious”. Damn you Peter Jackson! 

But I’m getting ahead of myself … For the benefit of out-and-out non-Tolkien-ites among you, here’s some background first … The Hobbit is a cult fantasy novel by Tolkien released in the 1930s. The LOTR trilogy of books was a sequel to The Hobbit. Director Peter Jackson, as you know, turned LOTR into a critically acclaimed, multiple-award-winning, money-spinning triad of films. He is now back with the baggage of that success, leaving us with a slight problem: Jackson has decided to split up The Hobbit into three films. Was it because he assumed that three films might make more money than one, or because he wanted to expand his canvas as far as possible? Either way, Part 1 – The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey – suggests that financial gain notwithstanding, at least on an artistic level that decision was a mistake. At 2 hours and 43 minutes, the film could test the patience of even Indian viewers bred on long films. Damn you Peter Jackson!   

An Unexpected Journey is the story of the hobbit Bilbo who is roped in by the wandering wizard Gandalf (McKellen) to join a band of 13 dwarves on their quest to win back their dwarven homeland from Smaug the evil dragon. Danger dogs them at every turn on their arduous journey, coming in the form of hungry mountain trolls, orcs on their gigantic wolf-like mounts, goblins and the inexplicable Gollum. It’s all great to look at, and visually worth every paisa of that expensive ticket you will buy for the 3D experience (I can’t comment on the much-talked-about 48-frames-per-second shooting innovation since I saw the film at a regular theatre). It’s also hard not to be drawn to the underlying theme of mighty deeds from seemingly small  people.

But The Hobbit suffers from the same problem that James Cameron’s Avatar did:  Jackson too seems to have fallen in love with his own work. There are only so many panoramic views you can take of gorgeous landscapes, so many fearsome creatures you can gasp at, so many lingering shots of weathered faces you can admire, if the accompanying story has been stretched inexorably to fit into nearly three hours of directorial self-absorption. Not surprisingly, the most memorable scenes and moments in The Hobbit go beyond the carefully laid out feast for the eyes: Bilbo’s fascinating first encounter with the very intriguing Gollum in an atmospheric hideaway; the disturbingly beautiful singing by the dwarves when they gather at Bilbo’s home at the start of the film; Gandalf’s wisdom and sense of humour; and the perky, animal-loving wizard Radagast. If only Jackson had given us more of this warmth and less of cold splendour. Personally, I was torn between widening my eyes in wonderment and keeping myself from nodding off to sleep as I watched The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Damn you Peter Jackson! How could you get it so right and yet so wrong?!

Rating (out of five stars): **3/4

MPAA Rating (US):

CBFC Rating (India):
PG-13 (for extended sequences of intense fantasy, action, violence and frightening images
U/A
Running time:
163 minutes


Photograph courtesy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hobbit:_An_Unexpected_Journey