Saturday, April 26, 2014

REVIEW 258: REVOLVER RANI


Release date:
April 25, 2014
Director:
Sai Kabir Shrivastav
Cast:

Language:

Kangna Ranaut, Vir Das, Piyush Mishra, Zakir Hussain
Hindi

What does a hard-core carnivore do when deprived of meat to tear into with its canines? I haven’t a clue. But I can tell you what a good actress does when deprived of a well-written role to sink her teeth into. In Kangna Ranaut’s case, she tries her darnedest best and ends up being a skeleton of a character, seething with potential for the well-fleshed-out person she might have played instead. That, in a nutshell, is the primary problem with Ranaut’s latest film.

Revolver Rani is set in Madhya Pradesh where an evil female don called Alka Singh (Ranaut) has just lost an election in Gwalior to Udaybhan Singh a.k.a. Bhanu Bhaiyya (Zakir Husain). She openly accuses him of taking a Rs 200 crore bribe from the evil Siddhantha Group of industries to evict poor tribals from their land. In a bid to finish her off, Bhanu decides to target her Achilles heel, her boyfriend the Bollywood star Rohan (Vir Das).

The film features chases and shootouts galore, abductions and seductions, kitschy sets, searing barbs directed at the news media and netas, a forced circumcision, and numerous standalone entertaining elements begging to be strung together impactfully into a cohesive, hard-hitting whole. Sadly, writer-director Sai Kabir Shrivastav seems not to have the chops to hold it all together, and what we get is a shadow of what-might-have-been.


Imagine the potential of a story in which Alka meets Rohan at a male beauty contest in Gwalior sponsored by an undie brand, with banners screaming Crazy Underwear Chambal Dud (they mean “dude”) No. 1. Imagine what could have been done with scenes in which the country bumpkin Alka reveals her own studded crazy underwear purchased from Bhainiss in Italy. There are plenty of hilarious or potentially hilarious scenes in Revolver Rani: the dialogues soaked in local lingo are unrelentingly amusing; a TV anchor plays a sort of sutradhar, spouting bad poetry, distorted film lyrics and dialogues to fit every news situation; Ranaut herself sustains a killer accent whenever she speaks English; and two sidey buffoon politicians with a boiling hatred for Alka had me guffawing every time they opened their mouths. Problem is that each of the main characters – Alka’s in particular – ends up feeling like a cardboard cutout rather than a real flesh-and-blood person, like a neat one-line concept that the writer failed to effectively expand. Alka is neither an all-out caricature of a female gangster nor is she all-out menacing nor is she a smooth blend of both.

Despite the film’s indifferent writing, even in its present form it’s likely to have been far more effective if it weren’t for the terrible sound design. There is no clarity in the speaking or singing voices here. Sound effects, songs and background score have all been allowed to clash throughout. In fact, the entire film seems to feature weak sounds crowded together.

I’ve seen hundreds of films at the multiplex where I watched Revolver Rani, but still, to confirm that the complex’s usually stable sound system had not taken a vacation on this particular day and to confirm that I wasn’t imagining RR’s audio issues, I stayed back to watch another film in the same hall within that multiplex immediately after my show of Revolver Rani. That second film was perfectly okay, so the problem must lie with RR alone.

Ranaut is still soaking in the universal praise for her performance in Vikas Bahl’s Queen. Her Alka in Revolver Rani is proof that even the best actors are only as good as the directors and writers they work with. She gets the swagger and the rest of the body language right, though in the absence of writing heft, after a while it feels like she’s posing around for still photographs rather than inhabiting a role. She’s well-suited to the film’s larger-than-life action scenes of the sort usually given only to male stars. Her eccentric wardrobe complements the package. She hits the bull’s eye with her dialogue delivery, especially of those baby-ko-tension-hoga lines about which I won’t reveal anything further here. By the end of the film though, I knew nothing about her beyond what I had learnt at the start: that her hard exterior belies the softness inside. Besides, the film’s impact is diluted by the manner in which it keeps straying away from her, especially in the second half.

The usually brilliant Piyush Mishra plays Alka’s mentor, Balli Mama, about whom we get to know little despite the considerable screen time given to him. Vir Das has his moments as Rohan, most especially in a scene in which he’s mock dancing while trying to talk to her, but those moments are few and far between. Besides, it’s never clear how Alka is so blind to his open disinterest, even revulsion towards her.

Considering that the film is clearly positioning itself as a sort of feminist farce taking apart the usually-male-dominated underworld genre, it’s disappointing to see it then succumb to stereotypical notions of how motherhood impacts a woman. Worse, it turns out that this hard-nosed, hard-headed gangsta chick estimates her entire self-worth on her inability to have babies. This is not to say that a woman in real life won’t be pained at the social derision aimed at her for being a “baanjh”, that crude Hindi word for a childless woman. Problem is that there is not a single voice in this film to pooh-pooh these clichés!

Revolver Rani is co-produced by Tigmanshu Dhulia, director of Saheb Biwi Aur Gangster and Paan Singh Tomar. Wish Dhulia had taken Sai Kabir’s basic concept, but chosen to script and direct this film himself. As things stand, Revolver Rani has many wonderful moments and ideas, but as a whole it’s neither satirical enough nor farcical enough nor intense enough nor thrilling enough to be what it seems to want to be. It’s not the cracker of a film that it could have been. Despite all its pluses, what it ends up being instead, is a damb squib.

Rating (out of five stars): **1/2

CBFC Rating (India):

U/A
Running time:
133 minutes

Visuals courtesy: Effective Communication, Raindrop Media

Thursday, April 24, 2014

SIT DOWN WITH SUBHASH GHAI / INTERVIEW PUBLISHED IN MAXIM MAGAZINE:

Shah Rukh Khan with Subhash Ghai while shooting for Pardes (1997)
(A shorter version of this interview by Anna MM Vetticad appeared in the November 2013 issue of Maxim magazine. The full text was published in Maxim India’s online edition.) 
“CRITICS DIDN’T LIKE KARZ, BUT IT IS NOW A CULT FILM. HOW THEN CAN ONE TAKE CRITICS SERIOUSLY?” ASKS SUBHASH GHAI
In a Maxim exclusive, filmmaker SUBHASH GHAI talks about cinema, audiences, success and failure, Rishi Kapoor, Salman Khan, Dilip Kumar and Anil Kapoor.
Your film Kaanchi was supposed to release in August. What happened?
I can take the pressure of making a film, but I can’t take the pressure of a pre-announced release date. I want to make my film, watch it, test it, then release it. These days however there is such a maara-maari for theatres that some people announce their release dates even before they’ve started work on the film. I can’t do that. I don’t want to repeat the mistake I made with Yuvvraaj where we had announced the release date in advance so it was sent to theatres straight from the mixing and recording studio. Due to lack of time, even I couldn’t see the final cut in advance. I don’t want to make films like that. I want to make films the way I’ve made them all my life.
Is it hard to cope with some of the changes that have taken place in the industry since you started in the 1960s?
Distribution and exhibition have changed dramatically since the 1980s and 1990s when I was most active. For instance films are released in thousands of theatres now. But one thing remains unchanged: every kind of film is being made including films of the sort that were doing well in the 1980s. Films like Dabangg, Ready and Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani which are very much in the old mould are thriving alongside films from the Dibakars, Anurag Kashyaps and other new-age film makers.
Subhash Ghai and Dilip Kumar celebrate the success of Saudagar,
their third film together, the others being Vidhaata and Karma
But do you find it tough to adjust to the changes in the industry’s functioning? For instance, you mentioned the hype around release dates.

Yes, it’s become difficult for anyone who wants to make a non-star-cast film. The Khans have taken over Eid, Diwali and Christmas and the rest of the weekends have been taken over by other stars. But you can’t get disheartened by that. If the picture appeals it will do well irrespective of who’s in the cast. Bhaag Milkha Bhaag didn’t have a big cast but it did well because it was made in a cinematic manner. Finally it’s the film that works. Even an OMG! Oh My God worked. But yes, the pressure to announce a release date is hard for a film maker like me.
Kaanchi stars Rishi Kapoor and Mithun Chakraborty but the young leads are non-stars. Is there a specific reason behind not using some of the more established names? Couldn’t you have got a Ranbir or Shahid or Ranveer Singh?
None of my films has had a superstar. I always went for the script first, then the artistes. Throughout the 1980s and ’90s I made films with stars who were viable, available to me and excited about working with me. When I did three films with Dilip Kumar, he was available to me because it was his second innings. Even when Shah Rukh Khan did Pardes, he was in the process of becoming a star, he was not yet a superstar.
Anil Kapoor and Salman Khan with Subhash Ghai on the
sets of Yuvvraaj (2008)
But you made Yuvvraaj more recently with Salman and Katrina Kaif?
Yes, but Salman was going through a rough patch at that time, just like me.
Why is Salman on such a career high now?
Because all this time he was finding himself, experimenting, doing all kinds of films. Even I gave him the role of a musician, which was wrong. He’s now changed his image and realised that what’s working for him are action love stories.
Why have none of your films worked at the box office since Taal in 1999?

As a filmmaker, when you deliver 11 hits in a row, you want to evolve. So I made Kisna and Yuvvraaj, both of which were of an international standard. But audiences still wanted the same old mass elements from me. Those two films were ahead of their time for the Indian audience.
Subhash Ghai with Jackie Shroff, Dimple Kapadia and
Anil Kapoor during the shooting of Ram Lakhan (1989)
Quite to the contrary, with those two films, critics seemed to think you had not moved with the times.

They were critics of the time, so they didn’t appreciate a film that’s ahead of its time. Critics didn’t like Karz either when it was released in 1980, but now Karz is considered a cult film. How then can one take critics seriously?
So you actually feel Kisna and Yuvvraaj were good films?
Of course.
So Karz didn’t do well at the box office or with critics?
Both. And a friend who watched it said he felt it’s ahead of its time, that it may not do well now but it will have a shelf life. He was right. Thirty years later, people are still talking about it. What the film couldn’t make in its entire lifetime, I made in one day when I sold the remake rights for Rs 3 crore. It’s like Raj Kapoor’s Mera Naam Joker, rejected at that time, but now considered one of the best films of his career.
Did you like the remake of Karz (called Karzzzz) starring Himesh Reshammiya?

I didn’t want to watch it. I wasn’t in the country when it was released and by the time I came back, people weren’t saying good things about it so I didn’t bother. Anyway, how could I watch someone else’s interpretation of my creation?
Subhash Ghai with debutant Mahima Chaudhry (earlier known as
Ritu Chaudhry) and Shah Rukh Khan on the sets of Pardes (1997)
But you appeared in Om Shanti Om. It may not have been a remake of Karz but it was certainly a tribute to your film.

That’s different. We are all inspired by many sources. Karz itself was inspired by The Reincarnation of Peter Proud. That’s the process of creativity. Om Shanti Om was not a copy of Karz, it was inspired by both Karz and Madhumati. That’s different from a film being remade with the exact same name and story. It’s not that I was bitter about the Karz remake. After all, we sold the rights to them. It’s just that I was busy and didn’t get the time to watch it.
Do you think it’s advisable to make a carbon copy of an old film without re-contextualising it? Without re-interpreting it for a contemporary situation?
It depends on the producer or director. Let them do it if they want to.
Would you?
No. Because my box of ideas is still packed so why would I make a carbon copy of an old film. Many people have even asked me to remake Karz, Hero and my other hits, but I’ve refused. I’ve sold the remake rights of Hero to Salman Khan Productions but mera idea box abhi khaali nahin hai that I would remake it myself. I have more ideas than there are years left in my life.
You’re working with Rishi Kapoor again in Kaanchi? What do you think has contributed to his wonderful second innings in films?
It’s a stroke of luck combined with his talent. He’s getting good films from good banners, but what’s helping Rishi do so well right now is that he remains as passionate, dedicated and hard-working as always. I’m so happy for him because he went through a low phase and now he’s back in full swing.
How about your own low phase? Ever got disheartened because of your box-office struggles post-Taal?
Not for a single day. That’s because I’ve never taken either hits or flops seriously. Even when a film was a hit, I’d just laugh and say, ‘Oh now I have to make a bigger or better film.’ These things only affect other people in the industry.
How?
When a filmmaker doesn’t deliver hits, people in the industry say, ‘That person is gone, that person has lost his talent.’ This only happens in India. In Hollywood, people don’t judge a filmmaker by his last hit. If Steven Spielberg were to make a bad film, they’d say, ‘He’s a talented filmmaker and we’ll wait for his next film.’ If Kaanchi becomes a hit, the same people who have written me off will say, ‘We always knew Subhash Ghai had talent.’
Doesn’t that hurt considering that they are your own film industry people?
We have a lovely industry, we love each other but we also feel envious and competitive. It’s up to every individual to be mature, to realise that you march with your own talent.
Ghai with Anil Kapoor and then newcomer Madhuri Dixit during the shooting
of Ram Lakhan (1989), the film that made Madhuri a superstar
When you cast Anil Kapoor and Jackie Shroff as co-stars in several films, how did you handle their rivalry?

I managed to strike a balance between Dilip Kumar and Raaj Kumar, so Anil and Jackie were not difficult for me.
But Dilip Kumar and Raaj Kumar were seniors when you did Saudagar, it was part of their second innings, whereas when you cast Anil and Jackie together they were young and at their peak with all the insecurities that accompany youth.
There’s a difference between Anil and Jackie. Anil’s an aggressive guy and Jackie’s a cool guy, so he can take Anil’s aggression with a smile and laugh. I don’t know why people consider them rivals. I think they are friends. I’ve seen them admire each other and laugh at each other. Sometimes relationships like that do develop.
What are your future plans?
From now on, I’ll be directing one film a year. Subhash Ghai as a filmmaker will be very, very active for the rest of his years.
---------- ends ---------- 
Photographs courtesy: Mukta Arts Limited


Note: These photographs were not published in Maxim

Saturday, April 19, 2014

REVIEW 257: DEKH TAMASHA DEKH


Release date:
April 18, 2014
Director:
Feroz Abbas Khan
Cast:




Language:

Apoorva Arora, Satish Kaushik, Tanvi Azmi, Vinay Jain, Satish Alekar, Sharad Ponkshe, Alok Rajwade, Jayant Wadkar, Ganesh Yadav, Dhiresh Joshi
Hindi

In a seaside town somewhere on the deceptively tranquil Indian coast, the giant cut-out of a neta falls on a poor man, crushing him to death. Under normal circumstances Hamid Tangewala would have got a funeral and been promptly forgotten by all but his closest family. As it happens, however, this is no ordinary poor man. He was once Kishan, an impoverished Hindu who fell in love with a Muslim woman called Fatima (Tanvi Azmi), converted to Islam and married her a long long time ago. In a nation perennially searching for political hot potatoes, a local Hindu leader (Sharad Ponkshe) shifts his attention from an offensive book to demand that “Kishan’s body” be handed over to “them”. What follows is a battle involving police, courts and media, in a film that underlines the utter ridiculousness of riots and religious bigotry, like few Hindi films have done in the past.

Director Feroz Abbas Khan’s Dekh Tamasha Dekh (DTD) is an unusual cocktail of humour and poignance, unusual because of the grimness of the subject and because he has chosen satire as an instrument to convey the bizarre lengths to which violence-prone communalists will go to score a point. Khan – a veteran of theatre, but relatively new to the film world – had earlier helmed Gandhi My Father, a film on the Mahatma’s strained relations with his son Harilal. The assured directorial hand he displayed on debut comes to his aid here again, ensuring that despite the bloodshed in the background, we are not offended when DTD induces tears and laughter in equal measure.

How can a film about riots be funny, you may well ask? Well it can be, just like a film set in a concentration camp could be a comedy? Khan displays the same directorial sleight of hand that made Roberto Benigni’s La vita é bella (Life Is Beautiful) such a hard-hitting commentary on Hitler’s Holocaust. Dekh Tamasha Dekh takes a swipe at hollow religious leaders on both sides who don’t give a damn about the people, but are happy to use them to further a dubious cause. It subtly slams the media through the character of a traitorous, chameleon-like journalist. As a hapless judge is asked to decide whether a body is Hindu or Muslim, whether that body must be cremated or buried, it gives us one of the most preposterous, most hilarious courtroom scenes ever seen in a Hindi film.

“Did you care about Kishan all those years ago when he was struggling for a living and desperately needed help?” the Hindu leader is asked. He has no credible answer and doesn’t care to search for one either. That the majority community’s bigots are hateful not just towards the minorities but also towards its own moderates is evidenced by the harassment of the gentlemanly, scholarly Professor Shastri (Satish Alekar) early in the film. Elsewhere, a moderate Muslim leader is summarily brushed aside by the more rabid elements of his biraadari, once the situation heats up. We are never shown exactly who started the riots, who lit that first fire, the point being that it doesn’t and shouldn’t matter.

Somewhere in between is an inter-community love story destroyed by the bloodshed. Most of all though, the film renders a resounding slap in the face of self-appointed guardians of “Indian culture” who assume that this country comprises one homogeneous mass of people, ignoring the vast differences in rituals and social practices across India, within states, and even within the same caste or religious community.

Some scenes are deliberately stage-like, in particular the ones involving the late Hamid’s daughter Shabbo and her boyfriend Prashant, further underlining the absurdity of the goings-on around them. This boy, who refuses to believe in a world of “them” and “us”, seems to live forever in a trance-like state, inhabiting a parallel universe far removed from his fellow citizens’ ludicrous antics that lead to tragic results.

The camera never rests for too long on any one character. Make no mistake about this though: this is a solid cast drawing on Shafaat Khan’s disturbingly incisive writing and the director’s clarity of vision. The performances are all uniformly fitting in a film with no heroes or heroines, only real people. It’s particularly heartening to see little Apoorva Arora from that 2011 gem Bubble Gum, all grown-up and playing Shabbo.

DTD is particularly resonant because of its timing, coming as it does in the middle of one of India’s most significant and polarising elections so far. It compels us to ask ourselves how political leaders can claim that a riot was not their fault if it lasted for more than a few hours under their watch. It holds up a mirror to every section of society that causes or permits communal violence to happen, either due to apathy or by actively sparking a flame. The silent secularist, the opportunist and the bigot are all to blame. The old man who takes off his hearing aid to find his peace, the editor who headlines a rumour to increase his newspaper’s circulation and save his job, the policeman who stays equidistant for a while for fear of being accused of bias, the sword-wielding rioter…in one way or the other, each one is to blame. Take one of these elements away from the mix, and the madness can end.

I laughed and cried through Dekh Tamasha Dekh because I was embarrassed and ashamed of the fact that every bit of stupidity and cruelty and insensitivity portrayed in it is true of today’s India. This is a film that should be compulsory viewing in social science classes across the country.

Rating (out of five stars): ****

CBFC Rating (India):

A
Running time:
109 minutes

Poster and trailer courtesy: Everymedia PR
Trailer 2 (“Is every Indian a Hindu?”:
Trailer 3:
Trailer 4: